2022
DOI: 10.1007/s44211-022-00230-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a fluorescent probe for cefazolin detection based on solvent-based de-emulsification dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of silver nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it outperforms spectrophotometry [24] and CL employing KMnO 4 ‐H 2 SO 4 reaction [34] in the analysis of IPM, as well as differential pulse voltammetry [31] and CL utilizing CuO NPs–luminol–H 2 O 2 reaction [35] in the analysis of CEF. Moreover, based on the data presented in Table S2, the analytical methods that demonstrated superior performance compared to the CL method developed in this study involved HPLC [19, 20], spectrofluorimetry [26], and CL utilizing tris (2,2′‐bipyridyl)ruthenium (II)–peroxydisulfate reaction [32] for VEX analysis, CL involving N ‐bromosuccinimide‐H 2 O 2 [33] for IPM analysis, and HPLC [22] and spectrofluorimetry [28] for CEF analysis. Other techniques presented in Table S2 exhibited almost comparable analytical parameters to those of the CL method developed in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, it outperforms spectrophotometry [24] and CL employing KMnO 4 ‐H 2 SO 4 reaction [34] in the analysis of IPM, as well as differential pulse voltammetry [31] and CL utilizing CuO NPs–luminol–H 2 O 2 reaction [35] in the analysis of CEF. Moreover, based on the data presented in Table S2, the analytical methods that demonstrated superior performance compared to the CL method developed in this study involved HPLC [19, 20], spectrofluorimetry [26], and CL utilizing tris (2,2′‐bipyridyl)ruthenium (II)–peroxydisulfate reaction [32] for VEX analysis, CL involving N ‐bromosuccinimide‐H 2 O 2 [33] for IPM analysis, and HPLC [22] and spectrofluorimetry [28] for CEF analysis. Other techniques presented in Table S2 exhibited almost comparable analytical parameters to those of the CL method developed in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain fluorescence methods mentioned in Table S2 pose challenges in their implementation. For example, certain experiments require heating the solution [27] or performing them in an organic solvent [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations