2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a framework to assess and guide IT investments: An analysis based on a discretionary–mandatory classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Value analysis: Joshi and Pant [24] develop a framework to evaluate diff erent IS/IT project investments through a mix of suitable methods. Th e nonfi nancial one of these methods is value analysis.…”
Section: Investment Spend Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value analysis: Joshi and Pant [24] develop a framework to evaluate diff erent IS/IT project investments through a mix of suitable methods. Th e nonfi nancial one of these methods is value analysis.…”
Section: Investment Spend Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Farbey, Land, & Targett, 1995;Irani, 2002;Joshi & Pant, 2008;Seddon, Staples, Patnayakuni, & Bowtell, 1998) Method flexibility It should be able to include different methods according to the specific requirements of the IT artefact. (Lin & Pervan, 2003;Seddon et al, 1998) Full scope The evaluation should comprehensively cover the cost and benefit side of IT evaluation.…”
Section: General Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mentioned IT evaluation scenarios included Enterprise Resource Planning, Customer Relationship Management and Business Intelligence systems. We linked those IT projects into taxonomies from literature to identify IT objects and consequently propose certain levels of complexity and evaluation consequences, such as the Benefits Evaluation Ladder (Farbey, Land, & Targett, 1995) or a discretionary-mandatory classification (Joshi & Pant, 2008). While discussing different aspects, it became clear that the framework needed not only to be general but also specific enough to account for the potentially different evaluation requirements of different IT objects, therefore following Seddon at al.…”
Section: Roles and Responsibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assim, buscar soluções eficazes para que a TIC apoie a organização se configura como um processo complexo que vai desde a escolha da forma do investimento até o método de avaliação dos benefícios e dos retornos tangíveis e intangíveis obtidos. Quanto aos métodos para avaliação, a aplicação exclusiva de medidas financeiras pode não ser adequada, uma vez que pode criar percepções enganosas sobre a eficácia dos investimentos (BALASUBRAMANIAN; KULATILAKA; STORCK, 2000; JOSHI; PANT, 2008;KHALLAF, 2012;PERERA;KAPLAN;NORTON, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionunclassified