2020
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a method to create uniform phantoms for task‐based assessment of CT image quality

Abstract: Purpose To develop a customized method to produce uniform phantoms for task‐based assessment of CT image quality. Methods Contrasts between polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and fructose solutions of different concentrations (240, 250, 260, 280, 290, 300, 310, 320, 330, and 340 mg/mL) were calculated. A phantom was produced by laser cutting PMMA slabs to the shape of a patient’s neck. An opening of 10 mm diameter was cut into the left parapharyngeal space. An angioplasty balloon was inserted and filled with the f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more practical assessment procedure should mimic clinical practice as much as possible. This principle is also consistent with some task-based evaluation procedures proposed by other studies [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A more practical assessment procedure should mimic clinical practice as much as possible. This principle is also consistent with some task-based evaluation procedures proposed by other studies [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…), furniture (door canopies, functional balustrades), welfare (cabinets), lighting (transparency and brilliance optical applications), etc. [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesion contrasts were 4, 9, 18, 30, and 38 HU (uniform phantom) and 10, 18, 30, and 38 HU (anatomical phantom). The lesion contrasts were validated in previous studies by HU measurement in 2700 images acquired with six different dose levels (uniform phantom) and in 2808 images acquired with twentyseven different dose levels (anatomical phantom) [10,11]. In these validation experiments, lesion contrast was calculated as HU difference between regions of interest (ROIs) of 0.5 cm 2 inside the lesions and six ROIs of 4.9 cm 2 (uniform phantom) and one ROI of 3 cm 2 (anatomical phantom) surrounding the lesions.…”
Section: Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%