Development of a Mini-CEX tool in simulation and evaluation of the subcutaneous drug administration skills of senior nursing students before graduation: A Pilot Study

Yılmaz, Derya Uzelli; Palandoken, Esra; Tuncalı, Sevil Hamarat; Caliskan, Sinem

doi:10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.336

Ann Med Res

2020

DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.336

|View full text |Cite

Development of a Mini-CEX tool in simulation and evaluation of the subcutaneous drug administration skills of senior nursing students before graduation: A Pilot Study

Derya Uzelli Yılmaz¹,

Esra Palandoken²,

Sevil Hamarat Tuncalı³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Comparing Satisfaction of Undergraduate Nursing Students`: Mini-CEX vs CIM in Assessing Clinical Competence

Saghir,

Ali,

Khan

et al. 2023

PJHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessing clinical competence is crucial to medical education, ensuring that future nurses possess the necessary skills and knowledge to provide high-quality patient care. Two widely utilized assessment methods in this domain are the Clinical Integrated Map (CIM) and the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX). Both approaches offer valuable insights into the clinical performance of health professionals. Objective: To assess the satisfaction level of the students between the Mini-CEX assessment versus the CIM assessment. Methods: A total of 12 BSN second-year semester-IV nursing students were enrolled in the project. The participants were randomly divided into two groups, with six students in each group. One group was assessed on the CIM tool, whereas the other group was assessed on the Mini CEX tool. The study was carried out at a private nursing college. Results: The age of the participants was between 18-25 years and most were between 18-20 years of age. Most of the participants were female and all were undergraduate’s students of semester four year two of Shifa College of Nursing. The results revealed that most students are satisfied while using Mini-CEX compared to CIM. Conclusions: Students' abilities and interests are vital for implementing Mini-CEX successfully. It has been highlighted as a useful formative assessment tool that provides timely feedback and enhances learning outcomes.

show abstract

Comparing Satisfaction of Undergraduate Nursing Students`: Mini-CEX vs CIM in Assessing Clinical Competence

Saghir,

Ali,

Khan

et al. 2023

PJHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Development of a Mini-CEX tool in simulation and evaluation of the subcutaneous drug administration skills of senior nursing students before graduation: A Pilot Study

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Comparing Satisfaction of Undergraduate Nursing Students`: Mini-CEX vs CIM in Assessing Clinical Competence

Comparing Satisfaction of Undergraduate Nursing Students`: Mini-CEX vs CIM in Assessing Clinical Competence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About