1996
DOI: 10.7144/sgf.3.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a new analyzing system for stomatognathic functions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the gnathohexagraph, a clutch is attached to the labial surface of the lower incisors and then results in an unnatural chewing action. However, the gnathohexagraph has been confirmed as accurate and reliable (38) and was therefore adopted for measurement of mandibular movements in this study. In this study, the focus was on mandibular movement as a factor relating to masticatory performance, but the impact of other factors on colour changes in colour‐changing chewing gum will be clarified in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the gnathohexagraph, a clutch is attached to the labial surface of the lower incisors and then results in an unnatural chewing action. However, the gnathohexagraph has been confirmed as accurate and reliable (38) and was therefore adopted for measurement of mandibular movements in this study. In this study, the focus was on mandibular movement as a factor relating to masticatory performance, but the impact of other factors on colour changes in colour‐changing chewing gum will be clarified in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromyographic signals were derived from both sides of the masseter and temporal muscles, 20,22) and mandibular movement at the incisor point was recorded with a Gnatho-hexagraph (JM-1000, GC Ltd.). 22,24) The EMG data were calculated from the mean of the four muscles. The number of chewing strokes, mastication time, total muscle activity, total EMG duration, EMG duration per chew, mean EMG amplitude, and muscle activity per chew were derived for the whole mastication process from the EMG data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling frequency of the mandibular movement was 89·3 Hz. The mean measurement error of the mandibular movement was 150 μm (SD 10) (20).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%