2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a screening tool to identify patients likely to benefit from clinical pharmacist review in a home-based primary care population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceptance rates for primary care providers were 69% [ 23 ], in contrast with 30% in our study. A recent study in the private sector had pharmacy resident-provider pairs making home visits to 25 homebound patients [ 24 ]. However, their study focused on developing a screening tool that identifies identify HBPC patients likely to benefit from in-home pharmacist review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acceptance rates for primary care providers were 69% [ 23 ], in contrast with 30% in our study. A recent study in the private sector had pharmacy resident-provider pairs making home visits to 25 homebound patients [ 24 ]. However, their study focused on developing a screening tool that identifies identify HBPC patients likely to benefit from in-home pharmacist review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, frailty (by the adapted eFI) was associated with greater post-acute care needs, higher 30-day readmission rates, and higher all-cause mortality within 6 months for non-urgent surgery ( 70 ). Furthermore, adapted eFI scores >0.32 may identify patients most likely to benefit from in-home pharmacist medication reviews, as shown in a small sample study ( 71 ). At last, the eFI has also been attempted to predict in-patient mortality after hospitalization or ICU admission for critically ill community-dwelling patients, but maybe less predictive value than the hospital frailty risk score (HRFS, constructed from hospital data, mainly ICD codes) ( 72 , 73 ).…”
Section: Application Of These Toolsmentioning
confidence: 93%