2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a scrupulosity severity scale using the Pennsylvania Inventory of Scrupulosity-Revised

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors note that they used a nonrepresentative sample of severe, potentially treatment resistant inpatients, which can bias ROC analysis results and lead to inaccurate cut-score suggestions. Moreover, Shapiro et al (2013) did not have information regarding patients’ religious affiliation or the reliability of OCD subtypes. Given the potential for using the PIOS as a screening measure, an examination of its factor structure and concurrent validity in an outpatient clinical sample is important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the authors note that they used a nonrepresentative sample of severe, potentially treatment resistant inpatients, which can bias ROC analysis results and lead to inaccurate cut-score suggestions. Moreover, Shapiro et al (2013) did not have information regarding patients’ religious affiliation or the reliability of OCD subtypes. Given the potential for using the PIOS as a screening measure, an examination of its factor structure and concurrent validity in an outpatient clinical sample is important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the potential for using the PIOS as a screening measure, an examination of its factor structure and concurrent validity in an outpatient clinical sample is important. Indeed, the studies by Nelson et al (2006) and Shapiro et al (2013) were notable in that they examined some psychometric properties of the PIOS or PIOS-R in clinical OCD samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2002) ve diğer çalışmalarla (Huppert ve Fradkin 2016, Olatunji ve ark. 2007, Shapiro ve ark. 2013 tutarlı olarak iki faktörlü yapının ülkemiz için de geçerli olduğu, ancak orijinal ölçekten farklı olarak 19 yerine 17 maddenin yer almasının daha uygun olacağı gösterilmiştir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Bu ve buna benzer çalışmaların yapılabilmesi ve dinsel obsesyonların daha iyi anlaşılabilmesi için geçerlik ve güvenirliği test edilmiş ölçüm araçlarının geliştirilmesinin önemli olduğu belirtilmektedir (Abramowitz ve ark. 2002 (Huppert ve Fradkin 2016, Shapiro ve ark. 2013) gerek madde sayısında azaltmaya gidilmiş olması gerekse faktörleri oluşturan madde dağılımının farklı çalışmalarda farklılık göstermesi nedeniyle ölçeğin Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin tekrar incelenmesi ihtiyacı doğmuştur.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified