2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a TaqMan based real-time PCR assay for detection of Clonorchis sinensis DNA in human stool samples and fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limit of our method was as little as one C. sinensis egg and two O. viverrini eggs in 100 mg of fecal sample, equivalent to 10 and 20 EPG, respectively. This result is similar with the egg detection limits in fecal samples of previous reports of 5-10 EPG by singleplex Taqman probe-based real-time PCR assay for C. sinensis eggs (Cai et al 2012;Rahman et al 2011) or of 10 EPG by singleplex FRET-probe-based real-time PCR assay for O. viverrini eggs (Intapan et al 2009a). Variations in the detection limits noted in various reports were possibly due to the analytical sensitivity examined the parasite DNA spiked in distilled water or fecal samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The detection limit of our method was as little as one C. sinensis egg and two O. viverrini eggs in 100 mg of fecal sample, equivalent to 10 and 20 EPG, respectively. This result is similar with the egg detection limits in fecal samples of previous reports of 5-10 EPG by singleplex Taqman probe-based real-time PCR assay for C. sinensis eggs (Cai et al 2012;Rahman et al 2011) or of 10 EPG by singleplex FRET-probe-based real-time PCR assay for O. viverrini eggs (Intapan et al 2009a). Variations in the detection limits noted in various reports were possibly due to the analytical sensitivity examined the parasite DNA spiked in distilled water or fecal samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The real-time FRET PCR was sensitive enough to detect four copies of each artificial positive template controls. The detection limit for C. sinensis and O. viverrini genomic DNA was both 0.2 pg, which is quite similar to the detection ranges of 0.1-1 pg of C. sinensis genomic DNA (Cai et al 2012;Rahman et al 2011) and far smaller than that of O. viverrini genomic DNA in a real-time PCR method, which was 30 pg (Intapan et al 2009a). The detection limit of our method was as little as one C. sinensis egg and two O. viverrini eggs in 100 mg of fecal sample, equivalent to 10 and 20 EPG, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The C T values were strongly correlated with the intensity of infections, as determined by egg counts in Kato-Katz smears (369). A similar approach with primers and a hydrolysis probe designed from the C. sinensis ITS1 sequence showed specific (with the exception of O. viverrini) and sensitive detection of C. sinensis in a small number of fecal samples and fish tissue samples (370) Primer sets for the detection of O. viverrini DNA in stool samples using LAMP were designed from the mitochondrial nad1 sequence and from the ribosomal ITS1 sequence of O. viverrini (373,374). The ITS1-based LAMP assay showed a 100% sensitivity compared to microscopy when tested on stool samples (n ϭ 50) from schoolchildren from an area of endemicity in Thailand, compared to a remarkably low sensitivity of only 24% using conventional PCR on the same target (373).…”
Section: Food-borne Trematodesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Both conventional PCR and LAMP have high risk of contamination. Moreover, even with expensive probe labeled real-time PCR, the two liver flukes are difficult to be distinguished [13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%