2022
DOI: 10.24036/epk.v3i2.264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Two- Tier Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Test Instrument Based on IBT on Chemical Equilibrium Material for SMA/MA Students

Abstract: HOTS is an ability to transfer, connect one material with another, possess information and solve problems derived from the information in a creative and critical manner. Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) are abilities that must be possessed by students in facing global competition in the 21st century industrial revolution 4.0 in accordence with the 2013 curriculum. This study aims to produce  a test instrument for higher order thinking skill (HOTS) in chemical equilibrium and determine the level of validity a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Name validity Rehabilitation 1 (Utama, Nurkamto, & others, 2020) 0.8 0.75 3 (Rintayati, Lukitasari, & Syawaludin, 2021) 0.92 0.801 4 (Effendi & Andromeda, 2022) 0.8 0.85 5 (Noryandi, Sitompul, & ..., 2022) 0.905 0.72529 6 (Kristiansi, Susilaningsih, Sumarni, & Priatmoko, 2022) 0.73 0.94 7 (Ananda, Kartono, & Ghasya, n.d.) 0.6 0.77 8 (Baddu & Arsyad, 2022) 4.08 0.83 9 (Sari, Pasani, & Hidayanto, n.d.) 3.49 10 (Hidayah, Tureni, Shamdas, & others, 2022) 0.85 0.9 12 (Indrawati & Elawati, 2022) 4.08 0.83 13 (Rangkuti, Nasution, Hasibuan, Afrida, & Ritonga, 2022) 3,9 14 (Asri, Sukmawati, & ..., 2022) 3,444 0.615 15 (Kosasih, Asmawati, & Suhendar, 2023) 0.95 0.717 16 (Maulina, 2022) 0.361 0.83 17 (Aryadi & Margunayasa, n.d.) 0.686…”
Section: Table 1 Data Validation and Reliability Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Name validity Rehabilitation 1 (Utama, Nurkamto, & others, 2020) 0.8 0.75 3 (Rintayati, Lukitasari, & Syawaludin, 2021) 0.92 0.801 4 (Effendi & Andromeda, 2022) 0.8 0.85 5 (Noryandi, Sitompul, & ..., 2022) 0.905 0.72529 6 (Kristiansi, Susilaningsih, Sumarni, & Priatmoko, 2022) 0.73 0.94 7 (Ananda, Kartono, & Ghasya, n.d.) 0.6 0.77 8 (Baddu & Arsyad, 2022) 4.08 0.83 9 (Sari, Pasani, & Hidayanto, n.d.) 3.49 10 (Hidayah, Tureni, Shamdas, & others, 2022) 0.85 0.9 12 (Indrawati & Elawati, 2022) 4.08 0.83 13 (Rangkuti, Nasution, Hasibuan, Afrida, & Ritonga, 2022) 3,9 14 (Asri, Sukmawati, & ..., 2022) 3,444 0.615 15 (Kosasih, Asmawati, & Suhendar, 2023) 0.95 0.717 16 (Maulina, 2022) 0.361 0.83 17 (Aryadi & Margunayasa, n.d.) 0.686…”
Section: Table 1 Data Validation and Reliability Nomentioning
confidence: 99%