Development of AEB control strategy for autonomous vehicles on snow-asphalt joint pavement

Wang, Xin-Qun; Wang, Jianhua; Sun, Weiyi; Wang, Yuncheng; Xie, Fei; Guo, Dongni

doi:10.1080/13588265.2021.1971426

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The existing control strategies include: based on the safe distance model, based on the safe time model, based on the driver's subjective feeling model, etc. [6] [7] The model based on collision time distance has the advantages of adjustable control and easy calibration widely used in the AEBS control algorithm for all kinds of vehicles, but because the object of this paper requires precise adjustment of vehicle control parameters, the model based on safety distance is selected as the target model, and because there are many kinds of safety models, this paper does not fixly select one as the research object, and only optimizes the variable parameters in it.…”

Section: Advanced Emergency Braking Model Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design of advanced emergency braking system based on vehicle-road cooperation

cao,

Liu,

2023

Seventh International Conference on Mechatronics and Intelligent Robotics (ICMIR 2023)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Advanced Emergency Braking Model Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design of advanced emergency braking system based on vehicle-road cooperation

cao,

Liu,

2023

Seventh International Conference on Mechatronics and Intelligent Robotics (ICMIR 2023)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…AEB and LKA may be sensitive to adverse weather conditions, including excessive glare or snow/ice [76][77][78]. In this study, the crash population was defined as those crashes that could be mitigated by AEB and LKA where the weather conditions were appropriate for the technology to work.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantifying the Lost Safety Benefits of ADAS Technologies Due to Inadequate Supporting Road Infrastructure

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) provide warnings to drivers and, if applicable, intervene to mitigate a collision if one is imminent. Autonomous emergency brakes (AEB) and lane keep assistance (LKA) systems are mandated in several new vehicles, given their predicted injury and fatality reduction benefits. These predicted benefits are based on the assumption that roads are always entirely supportive of ADAS technologies. Little research, however, has been conducted regarding the preparedness of the road network to support these technologies in Australia, given its vastly expansive terrain and varying road quality. The objective of this study was to estimate what proportion of crashes that are sensitive to AEB and LKA, would not be mitigated due to unsupportive road infrastructure, and therefore, the lost benefits of the technologies due to inadequate road infrastructure. To do this, previously identified technology effectiveness estimates and a published methodology for identifying ADAS-supportive infrastructure availability was applied to an estimated AEB and LKA-sensitive crash subset (using crash data from Victoria, South Australia and Queensland, 2013–2018 inclusive). Findings demonstrate that while the road networks across the three states appeared largely supportive of AEB technology, the lack of delineation across arterial and sub-arterial (or equivalent) roads is likely to have serious implications on road safety, given 13–23% of all fatal and serious injury (FSI) crashes that occurred on these road classes were LKA-sensitive. Based on historical crash data, over 37 fatalities and 357 serious injuries may not be avoided annually across the three Australian states based on the lack of satisfactory road delineation on arterial and sub-arterial (or equivalent) roads alone. Further, almost 24% of fatalities in Victoria, 24% of fatalities in Queensland and 21% of fatalities in South Australia (that are AEB- or LKA-sensitive) are unlikely to be prevented, given existing road infrastructure. These figures are conservative estimates of the lost benefits of the technologies as they only consider fatal and serious injury crashes and do not include minor injury or property damage crashes, the benefits of pedestrian-sensitive AEB crashes in high-speed zones or AEB fitted to heavy vehicles. It is timely for road investments to be considered, prioritised and allocated, given the anticipated penetration of the new technologies into the fleet, to ensure that the road infrastructure is capable of supporting the upcoming fleet safety improvements.

show abstract

Research on effectiveness of active braking strategy of autonomous vehicles for VRUs in mixed conditions

Hong,

Chen,

2024

Int.J Automot. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development of AEB control strategy for autonomous vehicles on snow-asphalt joint pavement

Cited by 7 publications

References 43 publications

Design of advanced emergency braking system based on vehicle-road cooperation

Design of advanced emergency braking system based on vehicle-road cooperation

Quantifying the Lost Safety Benefits of ADAS Technologies Due to Inadequate Supporting Road Infrastructure

Research on effectiveness of active braking strategy of autonomous vehicles for VRUs in mixed conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About