Development of an all-solid-state lithium battery by slurry-coating procedures using a sulfidic electrolyte

Ates, Tugce; Keller, Marlou; Kulisch, Jörn; Adermann, Torben; Passerini, Stefano

doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.011

Cited by 145 publications

(109 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

107

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The porosity of the resulting layer is reduced by a calendering step, before slitting the resulting coil into several slimmer coils. Main difference for the SLIB is the SES, which can be coated directly onto one of the electrode layers . In contrast, for the SLMB, an extrusion step is assumed for fabrication of the lithium anode.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Solid versus Liquid—A Bottom‐Up Calculation Model to Analyze the Manufacturing Cost of Future High‐Energy Batteries

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

All‐solid‐state batteries (ASSB) are promising candidates for future energy storage. However, only a little is known about the manufacturing costs for industrial production. Herein, a detailed bottom‐up calculation is performed to estimate the required investment and to facilitate comparison with conventional lithium‐ion batteries (LIB). Results indicate that sulfide‐based ASSBs can indeed be competitive if the material compatibility issues can be solved and production is successfully scaled. In contrast, oxide‐based ASSBs will probably not be able to compete if cost is the decisive factor. A sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo simulation reveals that the inert gas atmosphere required for sulfide‐based ASSBs contributes little to the overall cell costs, whereas the sintering step for oxide‐based ASSBs is highly critical. The calculation also indicates that in‐house manufacturing of the lithium anode will be cheaper than purchasing the lithium foil externally if the cell producer has sufficient processing know‐how. Finally, the aerosol deposition method is investigated, revealing that a deposition rate far above 1000 mm3 min−1 would be required to make the technology economically feasible in ASSB production. The results of this study will help researchers and industry prioritize development efforts and push the scale‐up of future high‐energy batteries with improved performance.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table S2, Supporting Information). Also an increase in the separator thickness or the anode balancing factor (corresponding to the anode thickness) results in a higher price, which could be of particular interest if additional protective layers are used . Further important cell design parameters are, among others, the cell housing dimensions .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solid versus Liquid—A Bottom‐Up Calculation Model to Analyze the Manufacturing Cost of Future High‐Energy Batteries

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[102] d) Schematicillustration and cross-sectional view of ad ual-electrolyte layer ASSB. [103] Chem. Eur.J.2020, 26,1720 -1736 www.chemeurj.org 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co. KGaA, Weinheim…”

Section: Sulfideionic Conductormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Solid-state batteries with such dual electrolytes demonstrated good cycle performance and ah igh specific capacity. [103] Recently,J ung et al developedanew scalable hybridization protocol to fabricate aL i 6 PS 5 Cl composite electrolyte with solvated ionic-liquidbased Li + -conductive polymeric binders. [104] The electrode and electrolyte were both prepared by means of aslurry fabrication protocol.…”

Section: Sulfideionic Conductormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, a PEO–LiTFSI polymer electrolyte transition layer was added between the β‐Li 3 PS 4 composite electrolyte and Li‐metal anode, which could prevent the reaction between them (Figure d). Solid‐state batteries with such dual electrolytes demonstrated good cycle performance and a high specific capacity . Recently, Jung et al.…”

Section: Polymer–inorganic Ionic Conductor Csesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Recent Progress in Organic–Inorganic Composite Solid Electrolytes for All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

Zhang

Qin

et al. 2019

Chemistry A European J

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conventional lithium-ion batteries, with flammable organic liquid electrolytes, have seriouss afety problems, which greatly limit their application.A ll-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) have received extensive attention from large-scale energy-storage fields,s uch as electric vehicles (EVs) and intelligent powerg rids, due to their benefits in safety,e nergy density,a nd thermostability.A st he key component of ASSBs, solid electrolytes determine the properties of ASSBs. In past decades, various kinds of solid electrolytes, such as polymers and inorganic electrolytes, have been explored.Amongt hese candidates, organic-inorganic composite solid electrolytes (CSEs) that integrate the advantages of these two differente lectrolytes have been regarded as promising electrolytes for high-performanceA SSBs, and extensive studies have been carried out. Herein,r ecent progress in organic-inorganic CSEs is summarized in terms of the inorganic component, electrochemical performance, effects of the inorganicc eramic nanostructure, and ionic conducting mechanism. Finally,t he main challenges and perspectiveso fo rganic-inorganic CSEs are highlighted for future development.

show abstract

Recent Advances in Liquid Metals for Rechargeable Batteries

Ponnuru,

Marriam,

Rambukwella

et al. 2023

Adv Funct Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Liquid metals (LMs) with their unique properties are considered for a range of applications such as energy storage, catalysis, electronics, and biomedical engineering. Recently, the introduction of LMs into rechargeable batteries has not only proven to improve overall performance but also overcome commonly known challenges like low energy density, material degradation, interface failure, and poor system integrity. Specifically, room‐temperature LMs such as gallium (Ga), Ga‐based alloys (GBAs), and metallic mercury (Hg) are promising candidates in rechargeable batteries due to their low viscosity, high electrical and thermal conductivity, excellent deformability, superior electrochemical properties, and self‐healing capability. Herein, a review of recent advances in LMs for rechargeable batteries, starting with a brief introduction to LMs fundamentals and their properties is presented. Then, an extensive literature review is carried out to summarize the LMs’ advances in addressing existing challenges of lithium‐ion, lithium‐metal, lithium–sulfur, and other rechargeable batteries. The current state of the art and future perspective are also put forward. It is believed that highlighting potential developments pertaining to LMs can fascinate researchers in exploring them for future rechargeable batteries.

show abstract

Development of an all-solid-state lithium battery by slurry-coating procedures using a sulfidic electrolyte

Cited by 145 publications

References 32 publications

Solid versus Liquid—A Bottom‐Up Calculation Model to Analyze the Manufacturing Cost of Future High‐Energy Batteries

Solid versus Liquid—A Bottom‐Up Calculation Model to Analyze the Manufacturing Cost of Future High‐Energy Batteries

Recent Progress in Organic–Inorganic Composite Solid Electrolytes for All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

Recent Advances in Liquid Metals for Rechargeable Batteries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About