1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00084-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of feeding selectivity in roe deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…by the relative palatability of surrounding species (Gill 1992a), so part of the explanation as to why the pines were avoided could be the presence of two species of higher palatability. It has been shown that roe deer can avoid less preferred food plants based on olfactory‐ and perhaps visual cues, without even tasting the plant (Tixier et al 1998). Attractiveness of Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) seedlings to roe deer increased with the darkness of their green colour (Bergquist and Örlander 1998) which is perhaps an indicator of their nitrogen content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by the relative palatability of surrounding species (Gill 1992a), so part of the explanation as to why the pines were avoided could be the presence of two species of higher palatability. It has been shown that roe deer can avoid less preferred food plants based on olfactory‐ and perhaps visual cues, without even tasting the plant (Tixier et al 1998). Attractiveness of Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) seedlings to roe deer increased with the darkness of their green colour (Bergquist and Örlander 1998) which is perhaps an indicator of their nitrogen content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using hand‐reared deer to study issues of physiology or nutrition, no biases are usually expected (Holand, 1994; Spalinger et al , 1997; Tixier et al , 1998; Dehnhard et al , 2001; Lambert, 2002). However, despite the obvious benefits of working with hand‐reared Roe deer, several potential biases should be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using hand-reared deer to study issues of physiology or nutrition, no biases are usually expected (Holand, 1994;Spalinger et al, 1997;Tixier et al, 1998;Dehnhard et al, 2001;Lambert, 2002…”
Section: Hand-reared Roe Deer In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…으로 식이물을 섭취한다 (Turner, 1979;Tixier et al, 1998;Rowell-Schafera, 2001). 이렇게 필요 한 에너지를 얻기 위하여 노루는 섭식-휴식-섭 식 행동을 반복하면서 하루 중 대부분의 시간을 보낸다 (Danilkin and Hewison, 1996;Mysterud, 1999 (Congalton et al, 1993).…”
Section: 노루와 같은 초식동물은 체중에 비하여 상대 적으로 많은 에너지를 필요로 하기 때문에 흡 수된 에너지를 최대로unclassified
“…노 루는 주로 산림지역 내에 서식하는 산림성 우제 류이며 (Fruziński and Łabudzki, 1982), 서식지 특성은 서식지 내 먹이자원의 질과 양(food), 물 (water), 잠자리 및 휴식처(cover), 공간(space) 등 서식지 구성 요소의 특성에 따라 많은 차이를 보 인다 (Leopold, 1993;Clutton-Brock et al, 1982;Shaw, 1985). (Danilkin and Hewison, 1996;Tixier et al, 1998;Radeloff et al, 1999;Yoon, 2003;Oh, 2004;Pettorelli, 2005) 나 치수의 구성 비율과 깊은 관련이 있는 것으로 판단된다 (Vincent et al, 1979;Danilkin and Hewsion, 1996). (Sokolov and Danilkin, 1981;Bromlei and Kucherenko, 1983;Mysterud et al, 1997;Mysterud, 1999 멀어질수록 노루의 서식지 이용률이 낮아지는 것으로 나타났다 (Figure 14).…”
unclassified