Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7_106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Geometrical Models of Hard-Alpha Inclusions for Ultrasonic Analysis in Titanium Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process involves first determining the boundary of the defect regions in an image. For this, automated flaw region and flaw boundary extraction algorithms have been previously developed [5]. Due to the complexity of the void structures and the inconsistency of the metallograph quality, however, we found that manually tracing the defect boundary to be the most reliable method.…”
Section: Geometrical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The process involves first determining the boundary of the defect regions in an image. For this, automated flaw region and flaw boundary extraction algorithms have been previously developed [5]. Due to the complexity of the void structures and the inconsistency of the metallograph quality, however, we found that manually tracing the defect boundary to be the most reliable method.…”
Section: Geometrical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…As noted above, the methodology incorporates physical models of the inspection process, and an important step is the validation of these model predictions. Detailed validations have been conducted for flat-bottom holes (FBH) and synthetic hard alpha inclusions (SHA) [5][6][7] and similar effects are in progress for naturally occurring defects [8,9].…”
Section: Basic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%