Development of higher order thinking skill (HOTS) assessment instrument for salt hydrolysis

Lubis, Alfi Rizkina; Sudrajat, Ajat; Nugraha, Asep Wahyu

doi:10.24114/jpkim.v14i1.31382

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…knowledge on acid-base materials. The planning stage is (1) compiling indicators of cognitive assessment instruments for science literacy, critical thinking and multiple intelligences, question grids, creative thinking ability test questions, scoring and assessment rubrics (Lubis et al 2022), (2) determining the validity of the instrument with the help of a chemical expert's test to validate the instrument that has been made, (3) planning the revision of the instrument in accordance with the advice of validators.…”

Section: Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity of instruments for assessment of scientific literacy and critical thinking of students based on multiple intelligence in acid-base material

Rahayu Wigati,

M. Noer,

Anwar

2023

J. Pendidik. Kim

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to create an assessment tool to evaluate students' scientific reading comprehension and critical thinking ability based on multiple intelligences on acid-base materials and to determine the validity of this study rating tool. The research methodology uses the Borg and Gal research and development model. This research phase continues into the development phase. The assessment instrument developed in this study consists of sixteen items of description test questions that refer to science literacy indicators consisting of four indicators are science as a body of knowledge; science as a way of investigation; science as a way of thinking; and the interaction of science, technology and society. Then the assessment instrument refers to critical thinking which consists of five indicators: providing a simple explanation, building basic skills, inference, providing further explanation, and developing strategies and tactics. This assessment instrument is based on multiple intelligences consisting of five types of intelligence: logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, visual-spatial, rhythmic-musical, and naturalistic. The validation of this assessment instrument is carried out by five validators. Validation by material experts is measured using the Guttman scale. Validity according to experts, namely aspects of material, language, and construction, obtained on average expert validation ranges from 90,33 – 94,7% and 16 questions are declared valid. Assessment instruments have been developed to be useful as a measure of a student's creative thinking ability.

show abstract

Section: Planningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity of instruments for assessment of scientific literacy and critical thinking of students based on multiple intelligence in acid-base material

Rahayu Wigati,

M. Noer,

Anwar

2023

J. Pendidik. Kim

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, there is still a limited number of HOTS test instruments available for electrochemistry topics in schools. To date, the development of HOTS test instruments using Rasch model analysis has only been available on stoichiometric (Abdullah et al, 2022), salt hydrolysis (Lubis et al, 2022), and acid-base reaction (Aprilia et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test Instrument on Electrochemical Material for High School Students

Nugrahnastiti,

Kamaludin

2024

j. kependidikan. has. penelit. kaji. kepustakaan. bid. pendidik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to develop a HOTS test instrument on electrochemistry topics that meets valid and reliable criteria. Apart from that, the level of difficulty, distinguishing power, ability level, and detection of respondent bias were also analyzed. This research is development research using the Tessmer model, which includes preliminary and formative evaluation stages. The HOTS questions consist of 15 multiple-choice questions. The validation data from experts is measured using a Likert scale. Coefficient Aikens’ V is then used to measure the validation data from reviewers. Experts and reviewer assessments indicated that the HOTS question instrument developed was very good. Analysis of questions using the Rasch model in a field testing of 33 high school students using a purposive sampling technique resulted in 14 valid questions and 1 invalid question with a reliability value of 0,69. There were 3 questions in the easy category, 7 in the moderate category, 1 in the hard category, and 4 in the extremely hard category. The analysis of the distinguishing power of the questions obtained 9 questions with very good criteria, 3 questions with good criteria, and 2 with fair criteria. The results of the validity of the students` responses showed that there were 4 invalid responses. The ability level shows that 5 students have high ability, 7 have moderate ability, and 21 have low ability. In conclusion, the developed HOTS test instrument for electrochemical material has a good quality and is suitable for evaluation.

show abstract

Development of higher order thinking skill (HOTS) assessment instrument for salt hydrolysis

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Validity of instruments for assessment of scientific literacy and critical thinking of students based on multiple intelligence in acid-base material

Validity of instruments for assessment of scientific literacy and critical thinking of students based on multiple intelligence in acid-base material

Development of a Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test Instrument on Electrochemical Material for High School Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About