PsycEXTRA Dataset 1992
DOI: 10.1037/e450272004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of quantitative specifications for simulating the stress environment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Team stress is a complex and dynamic phenomenon that is wholly dependent on the time and context in which it occurs (Driskell et al, 1992;Dietz et al, 2010). As such, the most accurate measurements of team stress are likely to take place when team stress is assessed in situ (i.e., during teams' natural performance episodes).…”
Section: Principle 3: Team Stress Should Be Measured In Situmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Team stress is a complex and dynamic phenomenon that is wholly dependent on the time and context in which it occurs (Driskell et al, 1992;Dietz et al, 2010). As such, the most accurate measurements of team stress are likely to take place when team stress is assessed in situ (i.e., during teams' natural performance episodes).…”
Section: Principle 3: Team Stress Should Be Measured In Situmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a single measurement of team stress is highly impacted by the time and context in which it was taken. One time/context-related factor that impacts team stress measurement relates to the fact that teams are exposed to different types and numbers of stressors at various points in time and in various situations (Driskell et al, 1992). Because teams experience different forms and levels of team stress, depending on the stressors they are exposed to, team stress measurements can vary substantially over time.…”
Section: Principle 4: Team Stress Should Be Measured Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings in the studies are not connected with the available theories; the only exception is the Artwohl's (2002) work attempting to explain particular perceptual distortion phenomena with Epstein's (2003) cognitive rational theory of personality. There have also been similar research overviews studying the decision making process under extreme stress published in the germane resembling areas (Bourne & Yaroush, 2003;Driskell, Mullen, Johnson, Hughes & Batchelor, 1992;Driskell & Salas, 1996;Stokes & Kite, 1994;Stall, 2004), where theoretical frameworks for explaining cognition under stress has been used 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Publications such as [25][26][27][28][29][30] try to determine the effects of stress on human performance.…”
Section: Several Studies Describe Roles Of Stress On Alertness and Atmentioning
confidence: 99%