2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Reliable and Validated Tools to Evaluate Technical Resuscitation Skills in a Pediatric Simulation Setting: Resuscitation and Emergency Simulation Checklist for Assessment in Pediatrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We, refined it based on expert feedback and prior airway checklists, and then piloted it to collect and interpret validity evidence for its future use. [14][15][16][17] The tool may be modified into two separate tools-one for basic airway assessment and one for advanced airway assessmentdepending on the intended use of the tool. For the purposes of scoring and testing the tool, we only scored the first pass, but we recommend rapid cycle repetition and allowing several attempts as an educational effort with future uses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We, refined it based on expert feedback and prior airway checklists, and then piloted it to collect and interpret validity evidence for its future use. [14][15][16][17] The tool may be modified into two separate tools-one for basic airway assessment and one for advanced airway assessmentdepending on the intended use of the tool. For the purposes of scoring and testing the tool, we only scored the first pass, but we recommend rapid cycle repetition and allowing several attempts as an educational effort with future uses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been other published tools for assessment of pediatric airway skills, but these were missing important components such as airway adjuncts and video laryngoscopy. [14][15][16][17] A recent publication referenced a comprehensive airway assessment checklist for adult patients, but did not include a pediatric assessment and included no validity evidence. 18 Given the significant anatomic differences and equipment choices for use in pediatric patients, this adult assessment was not suitable to assess providers skills in pediatric patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recomenda-se consistentemente que os especialistas possuam experiência na área do objeto que está sendo avaliado (26) . Identificou-se o perfil dos experts possuía titulação de doutorado, experiência em docência e prática clínica em UE, distribuídos nas regiões Norte, Sudeste e Centro-oeste do Brasil, o que garantiu credibilidade no processo de validação.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…São necessárias explicações claras em relação à exigência de como avaliar e à relevância dos itens dos instrumentos (26) . Para garantir as explicações claras para proceder a validação, foi elaborado um guia explicativo, detalhando os aspectos, critérios e referências utilizadas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Competency assessment tools have been developed for neonatal and pediatric TIs. Faudeux et al developed and tested a checklist‐based tool—the Resuscitation and Emergency Simulation Checklist for Assessment in Pediatrics (RESCAPE)—to assess trainees in four important skills including bag‐mask ventilation and intubation, and found it to be valid, reliable, and sensitive to change in simulated setting. Johnson et al developed a comprehensive neonatal tracheal intubation (NTI) assessment tool containing a 21‐item checklist, a behaviorally anchored global skills assessment scale, and an entrustable professional activity (EPA) scale.…”
Section: Airway Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%