Development of single‐dispenser pheromone suppression of Epiphyas postvittana, Planotortrix octo and Ctenopseustis obliquana in New Zealand stone fruit orchards

Suckling, D. M.; McLaren, G.F.; Manning, Lee-Anne; Mitchell, Vanessa J; Attfield, B.; Colhoun, K.; El‐Sayed, Ashraf M.

doi:10.1002/ps.3252

Cited by 16 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Changing spatial scale can affect the level of communication disruption owing to edge effects. 36 The method used for the mealybug and moth, with 16 traps at a series of spacings, was less trap intensive than with the midges (750 traps ha −1 ). In comparison, communication disruption of the mealybug reached higher levels than with the moth, irrespective of the lure.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Spatial analysis of mass trapping: how close is close enough?

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Apple leaf curling midge male removal, operating at a high trap density, with a 25:1 ratio of corner to centre catch, may have had an advantage in level of communication disruption owing to the high number of traps involved. Changing spatial scale can affect the level of communication disruption owing to edge effects …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial analysis of mass trapping: how close is close enough?

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…By contrast, the frequent recent use of blends of pheromones targeting multiple species contain antagonists (therefore making dispensers unattractive). This means that other mechanisms such as habituation are likely to play a dominant role for many of the new and prevailing generation of dispensers targeting multiple species . Habituation thus includes cases in which inhibitors can make blends unattractive but still provide behavioural disruption, evident as reduced activation under increasing atmospheric concentrations of pheromone plus inhibitor .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

With or without pheromone habituation: possible differences between insect orders?

Suckling

Stringer

Jiménez‐Pérez

et al. 2018

Pest Management Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The moths alone were affected by pre-exposure to pheromone. For pests without habituation, sustained attraction to a point source may make lure and kill more economical. Improved knowledge of behavioural processes should lead to better success in pest management and mechanisms should be investigated further to inform studies and practical efforts generally enhancing effectiveness of pheromone-based management. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

show abstract

“…1 Mating disruption of light brown apple moth (Suckling and Clearwater 1990) has been investigated for resistance management ), low residue apple production (Suckling and Shaw 1995), and to support fruit exports from New Zealand (Suckling et al 2011a) and Australia (Mo et al 2006). Until recently, the only slow release formulation reported has involved polyethylene plastic tubing (the Isomate "twist-ties," Shin Etsu Fine Chemicals, Tokyo), although aerosol formulations also have been investigated (Suckling et al 2007).…”

mentioning

confidence: 97%

Communication Disruption of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) By Using Two Formulations at Four Point Source Densities in Vineyards

Suckling

Brockerhoff

Stringer³

et al. 2012

jnl. econ. entom.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Executive SummaryWe conducted this economic analysis at the request of USDA-APHIS-PPQ-EDP. Our objective was to quantitatively characterize the economic costs to apple, grape, orange and pear crops that would result from the introduction of the light brown apple moth (LBAM), Epiphyas postvittana, into the conterminous United States. This information can be used to inform regulatory policy and funding decisions regarding LBAM.Our economic analysis had two components: 1) a geospatial analysis that identified areas at risk for LBAM establishment based on climate and hosts and 2) a quantitative analysis, using a probabilistic modeling approach, which estimated the economic losses LBAM could cause if introduced into these areas due to damage, control, quarantines and research. Economic effects outside of the agricultural crop (apple, grape, orange and pear) production sector, e.g. trade effects, are beyond the scope of this analysis and are not provided.Our geospatial analysis estimated that LBAM could establish throughout the majority of the conterminous United States. This establishment range included the majority of the growing area for the analyzed crops.Our quantitative model estimated the mean total annual costs if LBAM were introduced in the at-risk areas to be $118 million. The 5 th and 95 th percentile values were: $86 million and $150 million, i.e. 95 percent of the time, total annual costs exceeded $86 million.The combined results of our geospatial and quantitative analyses indicate that LBAM could cause substantial economic losses to U.S. apple, grape, orange and pear crops if introduced throughout the conterminous United States. We note LBAM is highly polyphagous and would probably cause additional economic damage to other crops and sectors of the U.S. economy, e.g. domestic and international trade. Also, because LBAM can occur in nursery stock,

show abstract

Development of single‐dispenser pheromone suppression of Epiphyas postvittana, Planotortrix octo and Ctenopseustis obliquana in New Zealand stone fruit orchards

Abstract: Deployment of single dispensers into commercial stone fruit orchards led to disruption of trapping for the three species and measurable reductions in insecticide use in cherries, peaches and nectarines without increased fruit damage (assessed in apricots).

Cited by 16 publications

References 33 publications

Spatial analysis of mass trapping: how close is close enough?

Spatial analysis of mass trapping: how close is close enough?

With or without pheromone habituation: possible differences between insect orders?

Communication Disruption of <I>Epiphyas postvittana</I> (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) By Using Two Formulations at Four Point Source Densities in Vineyards

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About