Development of the Japanese version of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire(BAQ).

Ando, Ayumi; Soga, Sachiko; Yamasaki, Katsuyuki; Saito, Satoshi; Shimada, Hironori; Utsuki, Narisuke; Oashi, Osamu; Sakai, Akiko

doi:10.4992/jjpsy.70.384

Cited by 87 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Translated versions of the AQ have been used in several countries including Croatia (Mejovsek et al, 2000), Netherlands (Meesters et al 1996;Morren & Meesters, 2002), France (Nahama, Ayoub, Borie, & Petit, 2003), Italy (Fossati, Maffei, Acquarini, & Di Ceglie, 2003), Japan (Ando et al, 1999;Nakano, 2001), Russia (Ruchkin & Eisemann, 2000), Spain (Andreu, Fujihara, & Ramírez, 1998), and Sweden (Prochazka & Agren, 2001;Prochazka & Ekblad, 2000). Typically, the four-factor structure of the AQ has been replicated with some minor adjustments or item deletions.…”

Section: Cross-cultural Researchmentioning

confidence: 98%

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Chinese Version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire in a Population of Hong Kong Chinese

Maxwell

2007

Journal of Personality Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I developed a Chinese version of the Aggression Questionnaire (Buss & Perry, 1992) by translating scale items into Chinese and subjecting them to standard validation procedures. I used confirmatory factor analysis via structural equation modeling to compare several measurement models. Models based on Buss and Perry's (1992) original four-factor (29-item) scale failed to replicate in the Chinese sample; however, the construct validity of Bryant and Smith's (2001) abridged version of the Aggression Questionnaire received strong overall support. The new 12-item scale demonstrated good fit to the data and adequate internal reliability. Evidence for criterion validity was provided by the scale's sensitivity to differing levels of aggression in males and females. Convergent and discriminant validity received partial support from the pattern of correlations with a measure of anger rumination. Linguistic and metric equivalence were supported by high correlation coefficients between scores on Chinese and English versions of the scale completed by bilingual Chinese on separate occasions. Consistent replications of these preliminary results across three independent samples suggest that the Chinese version of the Aggression Questionnaire may be useful for clinical assessment and cross-cultural research.

show abstract

Section: Cross-cultural Researchmentioning

confidence: 98%

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Chinese Version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire in a Population of Hong Kong Chinese

Maxwell

2007

Journal of Personality Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Alcohol › aggression (Lau and Pihl 1994) (Lange et al 1995;Ando et al 1999;Gidron et al 2001) Alcohol › aggression (Gerra et al 1995) Lifetime history of aggression (LHA): 9 behavioral categories ranging from fighting to disciplinary problems (Brown et al 1979b) Self-report Control individuals, personality-disordered individuals Olvera et al 2001) Alcohol › aggression (Soloff et al 2000) Aggression is measured by Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory (Beck et al 1961) Inventory Control individuals, psychiatric patients (Bouvard et al 1997) Alcohol › aggression (Workman and Beer 1992) Aggression, impulsive and hostility are measured by Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory MMPI (Mckinley et al 1948) Inventory Control individuals, criminals (Knight et al 1994;Knight and Cerce 1999) Alcohol › aggression (Cogan et al 2001) a resident mouse toward a stimulus intruder that are at least twice as high as under non-extinction conditions. This escalated form of aggression is sensitive to potent inhibition by anpirtoline, an agent with agonist action at 5-HT 1B receptors.…”

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Social and neural determinants of aggressive behavior: pharmacotherapeutic targets at serotonin, dopamine and ?-aminobutyric acid systems

et al. 2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) The preclinical focus on the behavioral characteristics and determinants of intense aggression promises to be most relevant to the clinical distinction between the proposed impulsive-reactive-hostile-affective subtypes of human aggression and the controlled-proactive-instrumental-predatory subtypes of aggression. The neural circuits for many types of human and animal aggression critically involve serotonin, dopamine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and specific receptor subtypes. (2) The dynamic changes in frontal cortical serotonin that are triggered by engaging in aggressive behavior imply that serotonergic drug effects are largely determined by the functional state of the receptors at the time of drug treatment. Of the numerous 5-HT receptors currently identified, the 5-HT(1B) receptors offer a promising target for reducing impulsive aggressive behavior, particularly if the action can be limited to sites in the central nervous system. (3) Aggressive confrontations are salient stressors, both for the aggressor as well as the victim of aggression, that are accompanied by activation of the mesocorticolimbic but not the striatal dopamine system. Dopaminergic manipulations, particularly targeting the D(2) receptor family, can influence aggressive behavior in animals and human patients, suggesting that mesocorticolimbic dopamine may have important enabling or permissive functions. (4) GABA is critical in the neurochemical control of aggressive behavior as evidenced by studies that directly modify GABAergic neurotransmission and neurochemical studies that correlate GABA measurements with aggressive behavioral responses in several animal species. The GABA(A) receptor complex is a mechanism through which certain benzodiazepines and alcohol enhance and inhibit aggressive behaviors. Social and pharmacological experiences decisively determine the effects of GABAergic positive modulators on aggression.

show abstract

“…The IDS-SR (30 items) and BAQ (29 items) are widely used self-rating scales for measuring elements of depression and aggression, respectively (Rush et al 1986;Buss and Perry 1992;Ando et al 1999;Nakano 2001;Trivedi et al 2004). The IDS-SR is a self-report questionnaire that measures depression severity and assesses all symptoms of depression as defined by the DSM-IV, including melancholic, atypical, and anxious symptoms.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anger Is a Distinctive Feature of Epilepsy Patients with Depression

Mori

Kanemoto

Onuma

et al. 2014

Tohoku J. Exp. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development of the Japanese version of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire(BAQ).

Cited by 87 publications

References 19 publications

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Chinese Version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire in a Population of Hong Kong Chinese

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Chinese Version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire in a Population of Hong Kong Chinese

Social and neural determinants of aggressive behavior: pharmacotherapeutic targets at serotonin, dopamine and ?-aminobutyric acid systems

Anger Is a Distinctive Feature of Epilepsy Patients with Depression

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About