2020
DOI: 10.2130/jjesp.1907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the smartphone-based Internet Addiction Tendency Scale for high school students and technical college students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another measure of PSU The short version of the Smartphone-based Internet Addiction Tendency Scale (SIATS-SV) was used [ 48 ]. Of the 38 items from the original scale, [ 49 ], the short version comprises 16 items endorsed to a four-factor structure, namely, unsettled state of mind, regulation difficulty, smartphone incentives, and approval needs. The validity of both versions has been examined among Japanese high school students in the cited articles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another measure of PSU The short version of the Smartphone-based Internet Addiction Tendency Scale (SIATS-SV) was used [ 48 ]. Of the 38 items from the original scale, [ 49 ], the short version comprises 16 items endorsed to a four-factor structure, namely, unsettled state of mind, regulation difficulty, smartphone incentives, and approval needs. The validity of both versions has been examined among Japanese high school students in the cited articles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-reported problematic smartphone use. The Smartphone-based Internet Addiction Tendency Scale (SIATS) (Kurokawa, Honjo, & Mishima, 2020) was used to measure PSU. The scale begins with the statement, "This questionnaire asks you about your smartphone use on a normal day."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 41 The JIAT has shown good reliability and validity. 17 , 41 , 42 In our study, we considered a JIAT total score of ≥ 50 as IA., and that of < 50 as non-IA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%