2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of three layered buccal compact containing metoprolol tartrate by statistical optimization technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in this work, central composite design was used to simultaneously study the effect of the two formulation variables of the chitosan-alginate delivery system on two response variables. Central composite design (CCD) and analysis of response surfaces were used because they are systematic and efficient methods to study the effect of multiple variables and to find an optimum formulation (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this work, central composite design was used to simultaneously study the effect of the two formulation variables of the chitosan-alginate delivery system on two response variables. Central composite design (CCD) and analysis of response surfaces were used because they are systematic and efficient methods to study the effect of multiple variables and to find an optimum formulation (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected model was further assessed for the lack of fit (LOF) and for the studied responses; LOF was not found to be significant (21)(22). The values of R 2 , adjusted R 2 , predicted R 2 , SD, % CV (Table II) and the analysis of variance results for each response (ANOVA) in Table II (12.036) were found to be higher than 4, indicating the adequacy and suitability of the model for the studied responses (23)(24).…”
Section: Data Optimization and Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The coefficients b 1 , b 2 , and b 11 were found to be significant at p < 0.05; hence they were retained in the reduced model. The reduced model was tested in portions to determine whether the coefficients b 12 Table 4. The reduced model was tested in portions to determine whether the coefficients b 11 , b 12 , and b 22 contribute significant information for the prediction of %F or not.…”
Section: Measurement Of Powder Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced model was tested in portions to determine whether the coefficients b 12 Table 4. The reduced model was tested in portions to determine whether the coefficients b 11 , b 12 , and b 22 contribute significant information for the prediction of %F or not. The results for testing the model in portions are depicted in Table 4.…”
Section: Measurement Of Powder Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%