Development, reliability, and validity of the Insulin Treatment Self‐Management Scale

Okuroğlu, Gülten Karahan; Atbaş, Sema Karaçanta; Alpar, Şule Ecevit

doi:10.1111/ijn.12814

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A value of at least 0.7 was considered satisfactory internal reliability (Nunnally and Bernstein, 1994;Sushil and Verma, 2010). Spearman-Brown split-half reliability was also calculated, a correlation coefficient ≥ 0.7 indicates good internal reliability (Cronbach, 1951;Karahan Okuroglu et al, 2019). The test-retest reliability was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient between two time-points with a gap of 2 weeks in 40 randomly collected hypertensive patients.…”

Section: Reliability Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Development and Psychometric Assessment of Chinese Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP)

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To develop the medication literacy scale for patients with hypertension, and to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Methods: The initial draft of the scale was formulated based on the operationalization of medication literacy with four core elements of knowledge, attitude, skill, and practice, and was developed through procedures of literature review, interviews to hypertensive patients, and research group discussion. Expert panel meeting, interviews, and pre-test on the initial draft of the scale to 10 hypertensive patients, as well as a two iterations of expert feedback were used to form a primary medication literacy scale for pilot investigation and item selection. In this study, 260 patients with hypertension in Changsha city of China were purposively selected to conduct a pilot survey using the primary medication literacy scale. After item selection by a series of statistical analysis method and item rewording according to patients' feedback, the scale was revised to form a formal investigation scale with four domains and 37 items. A formal investigation was carried out on 650 patients with hypertension selected purposively in a tertiary general hospital and two community health service centers in Changsha city of China. The reliability and validity of the scale were analyzed. Results: Finally, the formal scale consists of four domains on knowledge, attitude, practice and skills, 11 sub-factors and 37 items in total. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) of this scale was 0.968, and the I-CVI for each item ranged from 0.833 to 1.000, indicating a good and acceptable content and face validity. The Cronbach's a coefficient was 0.849 for the overall scale and ranged from 0.744 to 0.783 for domains. The Pearson's correlation coefficients between domains and the total scale were ranging from 0.530 to 0.799. Besides, the Pearson's correlation coefficient among domains of the scale ranged from 0.157 to 0.439. The Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient was 0.893 for the total scale and ranged from 0.793 to 0.872 for domains. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the total scale was 0.968 and ranged from 0.880 to 0.959 for

show abstract

Section: Reliability Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Development and Psychometric Assessment of Chinese Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP)

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Spearman-Brown split-half reliability was also measured. A correlation coefficient ≥0.70 indicates good internal reliability [ 46 ]. The test-retest reliability was measured by Pearson’s correlation coefficient between two time-points with a gap of 2 weeks in 40 randomly collected residents.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and psychometric assessment of the public health emergency risk perception scale: Under the outbreak of COVID-19

Shen

Zhong

Xie

et al. 2021

International Journal of Nursing Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Healthcare providers should assess patients' self‐management capacity and provide tailored interventions to improve health outcomes. Several self‐management scales have been developed for chronic conditions, such as diabetes (Karahan Okuroglu et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2008), hypertension (Warren‐Findlow et al, 2013), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Zhang et al, 2013). These instruments commonly measure the level of self‐management in areas such as medication compliance, lifestyle modification, self‐monitoring of symptoms, regular physical activity, and adherence to medical treatment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and initial validation of the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease self‐management questionnaire

Kwon

Jang

Lee

et al. 2021

Research in Nursing & Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing, and self‐management is essential to improve health outcomes in this population. Despite the importance of self‐management, there is no instrument to assess it in patients with NAFLD. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an initial version of a self‐management questionnaire for patients with NAFLD. This was a methodological and psychometric study conducted between April and November 2019. The NAFLD self‐management questionnaire was developed after a theoretical and literature review and focus group interviews in three phases: (1) item generation, (2) item evaluation, and (3) psychometric evaluation. Participants (N = 155) were recruited from a hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Items were generated based on clinical NAFLD guidelines and the individual and family self‐management theory. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis. Six‐factors were extracted from 22 items: lifestyle management, medical treatment compliance, management of medication and dietary supplements, alcohol consumption management, sleep management, and family support. These factors accounted for 67.4% of the total variance; each factor had an eigenvalue greater than 1, and Cronbach's alpha for the scale was 0.87. The NAFLD self‐management questionnaire showed acceptable initial validity and reliability. The instrument can prove useful in the formulation of tailored interventions based on individual patients' care needs. Furthermore, it may be used as an indicator of health outcomes in this population.

show abstract

Development, reliability, and validity of the Insulin Treatment Self‐Management Scale

Cited by 7 publications

References 22 publications

The Development and Psychometric Assessment of Chinese Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP)

The Development and Psychometric Assessment of Chinese Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP)

Development and psychometric assessment of the public health emergency risk perception scale: Under the outbreak of COVID-19

Development and initial validation of the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease self‐management questionnaire

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About