Deviated nose attenuates the degree of patient satisfaction and quality of life in rhinoplasty: a prospective controlled study

Cingi, Cemal; Eskıızmır, Görkem

doi:10.1111/coa.12099

Cited by 36 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Opposingly, Cingi and Eskiizmir found that postoperative satisfaction in patients with nondeviated nasal deformities improves to a greater degree than those with deviated noses. 20 In another study, Cingi et al 27 found that patients have equal improvements in satisfaction following primary and secondary rhinoplasty. As such, it is important for future work to further study how the aforementioned factors interplay with structural and dorsal preservation surgical techniques with regard to overall patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Patient Satisfaction following Structural versus Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, dorsal preservation rhinoplasty has been gained acceptance among facial plastic surgeons. Despite this, there is limited literature on patient satisfaction following preservation rhinoplasty. This systematic review aims to evaluate all studies quantifying patient satisfaction and to compare results between structural and dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. OVID Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched. All studies from the years 2010 to 2020 evaluating satisfaction in patients receiving either structural or dorsal preservation rhinoplasty were included. Data regarding study demographics as well as patient satisfaction results were extracted from included studies. Descriptive results and analysis were calculated. A total of 2,172 articles were initially identified, of which 29 articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 29 articles, 25 were focused on structural rhinoplasty and 4 were focused on preservation rhinoplasty. Of the 25 structural rhinoplasty articles, 17 used the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction and 5 used the FACE-Q scale. Among the 25 structural rhinoplasty studies, 14 (56%) reported statistically significant improvements in patient satisfaction evaluation scores after rhinoplasty. Among the four preservation rhinoplasty studies, one (25%) study reported significant improvements in satisfaction scores after rhinoplasty. Despite this, most studies included a statement that satisfaction improved in patients following rhinoplasty. Literature in this review supports both structural and preservation rhinoplasty, resulting in high satisfactory results for patients following surgery. More research must be conducted to further quantify satisfaction following preservation rhinoplasty and prospectively compare satisfaction between the two rhinoplasty techniques.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Patient Satisfaction following Structural versus Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1,9,10 Furthermore, rhinoplasty was found to significantly increase the quality of life in terms of an improved satisfaction with appearance, self-confidence, and social interaction. [11][12][13][14] With a proper preoperative assessment, patients are expected to be satisfied both functionally and psychosocially. 12,15 However, many deformities such as hooked or saddle noses are more apparent when observed from a full profile view.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Nose Influences Visual and Personality Perception

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nasal deformities are known to attract attention, are felt to be stigmatizing, and are known to affect negatively the perception of personalities. These effects have not been studied on profile views. The objective of this study was the quantification of visual attention directed toward nasal deformities and its impact on the perception of personality traits. Forty observers were divided into two groups and their visual scanpaths were recorded. Both groups observed a series of photographs displaying profile views of 20 adult patients' faces with one or more nasal deformities or computer-morphed corrected noses. Photographs were chosen from a consecutive sample of patients (range: 17-68 years, median: 45) who requested a rhinoplasty at the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery of the Cantonal Hospital Sankt Gallen, Switzerland. Patients' photographs showed a nasal deformity in one series and a computer-morphed nose in the other series and vice versa. Visual fixation times on the noses were compared between the photographs with and without a nasal deformity. Observers subsequently rated personality traits using visual analog scales. The nasal profile with a deformity received more visual attention in 17 of 20 patients (85%). The mean relative fixation duration of all nasal deformities was significantly larger compared with all computer-simulated noses (17.3 ± 6.9 [SD] vs. 10.6 ± 2.5%; p < 0.001). Cumulative personality questionnaire scores and the score for satisfaction were significantly lower for faces with nasal deformities compared with computer-morphed noses (27.8 ± 6.0 vs. 29.1 ± 6.0, p = 0.040, and 5.3 ± 1.59 vs. 5.7 ± 1.53, p = 0.017, respectively). For deformed noses, the mean relative fixation duration did not correlate with the cumulative personality score (R = - 0.399; p = 0.082). To the best knowledge of the authors, an attention-drawing potential of nasal deformities on a profile view has been quantified for the first time. This seems to lead to a more negative perception of personality traits.

show abstract

“…Cingi and Eskiizmir used the European Quality of Life–5 Dimension (EQ‐5D) questionnaire. Their results showed high satisfaction and a positive impact on their patients' quality of life, as the mean EQ‐5D index was raised to 0.93 ± 0.20 postoperatively from 0.34 ± 0.29 preoperatively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of life of patients who underwent aesthetic rhinoplasty: 100 cases assessed with the Glascow Benefit Inventory

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Deviated nose attenuates the degree of patient satisfaction and quality of life in rhinoplasty: a prospective controlled study

Abstract: Rhinoplasty can provide an objective improvement, high satisfaction and positive impact on quality of life. However, the degree of satisfaction and improvement in quality of life in patients with deviated nose deformity are less than patients with non-deviated nose deformity.

Cited by 36 publications

References 24 publications

Patient Satisfaction following Structural versus Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

Patient Satisfaction following Structural versus Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

The Nose Influences Visual and Personality Perception

Quality of life of patients who underwent aesthetic rhinoplasty: 100 cases assessed with the Glascow Benefit Inventory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About