2014 Sixth International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/comsnets.2014.6734904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DF versus AF: Energy consumption comparison for IEEE 802.15.4 networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step I: Parameter setup: Set P X according to (7), Channel parameter setting according to (8), Determine initial buffer size  and predefined target secrecy rate R s .…”
Section: Derivation Of the Total Secrecy Outage Probability Associated To Buffer-aided Relayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Step I: Parameter setup: Set P X according to (7), Channel parameter setting according to (8), Determine initial buffer size  and predefined target secrecy rate R s .…”
Section: Derivation Of the Total Secrecy Outage Probability Associated To Buffer-aided Relayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relay-assisted communications such as amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) have emerged as appropriate solutions to enhance the transmission performance of wireless systems [5,6]. Regarding the appropriate relaying strategy in an interference environment such as underlay CRNs, the DF scheme is more suitable rather than other methods due to the fact that it provides increased capacity [7], less energy consumption [8] and lower outage probability [9]. Moreover, conventional relaying protocols such as AF and DF include two stages where in the first phase (time-slot), the message is received from the source and in the second phase, the received message is processed before being forwarded to destination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous literature author has done a comparative study between AF and DF relay for energy efficiency prospective [10] [3]. Another related literature includes, [11] [12], where authors have developed a simulation model to find out the chip error rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, (20) shows how I 3.R scales with respect to the diversity gain (i.e., SN R/τ M ) if Q is large. Notice that I 4.R is unaffected by Q as it represents the average SEP between S → D where no relays are used.…”
Section: B Large Number Of Relay: Q → ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PRS, channel information is only required locally at the source node, which enables to achieve high cooperative diversity at reduced overall complexity. Decode-and-forward (DF) relays are the ideal choice for cooperative MTC due to its EE [20], simple interference cancellation [21], and unlike AF relaying does not suffer from high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%