2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing organizational risks in software projects: Stakeholder resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(182 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The project management literature recognizes that project stakeholders are important for project success for at least four reasons. First, the project needs contributions (financial and nonfinancial resources) from stakeholders; second, stakeholders often establish the criteria for assessing the success of the project; third, stakeholders’ (potential) resistance may cause various risks and negatively affect the success of the ­project; and fourth, the project may affect stakeholders in both negative and positive ways (see, e.g., Aarseth, Rolstadas, & Andersen, ; de Bakker, Boonstra, & Wortmann, ; McLeod, Doolin, & MacDonel, ; Morris & Hough, ; Sallinen, Ahola, & Ruuska, ; Turner & Zollin, ; Vrhovec, Hovelja, Vavpotič, & Krisper, ). The literature also identifies typical project stake­holders to include investors, −suppliers, customers, users, authorities, neighbors, media, and so forth (see, e.g., Turner & Zollin, ).…”
Section: Project Stakeholder Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project management literature recognizes that project stakeholders are important for project success for at least four reasons. First, the project needs contributions (financial and nonfinancial resources) from stakeholders; second, stakeholders often establish the criteria for assessing the success of the project; third, stakeholders’ (potential) resistance may cause various risks and negatively affect the success of the ­project; and fourth, the project may affect stakeholders in both negative and positive ways (see, e.g., Aarseth, Rolstadas, & Andersen, ; de Bakker, Boonstra, & Wortmann, ; McLeod, Doolin, & MacDonel, ; Morris & Hough, ; Sallinen, Ahola, & Ruuska, ; Turner & Zollin, ; Vrhovec, Hovelja, Vavpotič, & Krisper, ). The literature also identifies typical project stake­holders to include investors, −suppliers, customers, users, authorities, neighbors, media, and so forth (see, e.g., Turner & Zollin, ).…”
Section: Project Stakeholder Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Yin (2010), the exploratory analysis is one that explores situations in which the evaluated intervention does not have a clear set of results. Vrhovec et al (2015) complements that a case study identifies the complex interaction between different stakeholders; it is a suitable way to investigate contemporary events where the environment is not controlled and; this is an appropriate way to study the implementation or development of software in the organizational environment. The present study will adopt a multiple longitudinal case study (Yin, 2010), contemplating the implementation of the ERP system in a Corporative Unit and in six production plants, between 2011 and 2016.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review of literature and sources shows that individual authors dealt with the issue by individual fields (for example, Vidovič, 2005;Kovač, 2016;Turk, 2010;Igličar, 2011), and the authors made links primarily between organisational sciences and the field of information technology (Davenport, 1993;Harrington et al, 1997, Bajec, 2001Burlton, 2001;Kovačič, Bosilij Vukšič, 2005;Štamberger, Jaklič, 2007;Bohanec, 2012;Vrhovec et al, 2015), a topic about which a lot of literature can be found. The strategic planning of organisations and information technologies, modern approaches to information technology planning, the connection between business-information architecture as well as the integration of processes and information systems were analysed by numerous domestic and foreign authors (Avison, Fitzegarld 2003;Finkelstein, 2006;Jacobson et al 2001;Kovačič et al, 2001;Krstov, 2006;Montazemi et al, 2010;Rožanec, 2013;Lahajnar, Rožanec 2016a, Lahajnar, Rožanec 2016b.…”
Section: Zaključekmentioning
confidence: 99%