2001
DOI: 10.1253/jcj.65.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Atheroma by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract: therosclerosis of the carotid artery is the primary cause of stroke, and cerebral infarction is the major cause of death. Infarction occurs secondary to plaque ulceration, thrombosis, and intraplaque hemorrhage. [1][2][3] The stability of atheroma has been investigated by angiography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and of these, angiography is the standard imaging technique for diagnosing arterial stenosis. However, not only the extent of stenosis but also the features of the atheroma are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the ability of MRA to distinguish between multiple types of vessel pathology as well as to chart disease progression compares favorably to DSA and other modalities. [33][34][35][36] El-Saden et al compared, with catheter angiography, the ability of both DUS and MRA to differentiate between near total and total ICA occlusion. 37 Of the 55 patients with catheter angiographically verified ICA disease, DUS picked up 100% of the total occlusions, whereas MRA distinguished 92%.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the ability of MRA to distinguish between multiple types of vessel pathology as well as to chart disease progression compares favorably to DSA and other modalities. [33][34][35][36] El-Saden et al compared, with catheter angiography, the ability of both DUS and MRA to differentiate between near total and total ICA occlusion. 37 Of the 55 patients with catheter angiographically verified ICA disease, DUS picked up 100% of the total occlusions, whereas MRA distinguished 92%.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%