2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility and robustness of fibrosis blood tests in chronic hepatitis C: A meta-analysis with individual data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
38
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The AUROCs of each test were comparable to those reported in the original publications [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]18,20] when expressed using observed-AUROCs according to the prevalence of stages defining advanced and non-advanced fibrosis. We observed similar AUROCs to those reported in meta-analyses [34][35][36] for the most validated biomarkers, Fibrotest Ò , Fibrometer Ò , and Apri and without major differences with interpretable Fibroscan™, Hepascore Ò , and ELFG. In diagnosing cirrhosis, the ''Fibrostic'' study [37] showed a significantly better performance of Fibroscan™ compared to serum markers while in contrast, our study shows that all the tests performed equivalently.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The AUROCs of each test were comparable to those reported in the original publications [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]18,20] when expressed using observed-AUROCs according to the prevalence of stages defining advanced and non-advanced fibrosis. We observed similar AUROCs to those reported in meta-analyses [34][35][36] for the most validated biomarkers, Fibrotest Ò , Fibrometer Ò , and Apri and without major differences with interpretable Fibroscan™, Hepascore Ò , and ELFG. In diagnosing cirrhosis, the ''Fibrostic'' study [37] showed a significantly better performance of Fibroscan™ compared to serum markers while in contrast, our study shows that all the tests performed equivalently.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…-the comparison of this specific test to previous blood tests, called here HCV fibrosis tests, either simple or sophisticated as distinguished in the previous large comparative study [14]; -the best overall diagnostic performance by calculating the diagnostic cut-off values of HCV fibrosis tests adapted for the diagnosis of significant liver fibrosis in this HIV/HCV population [10,19]; -the single performance of blood tests for each fibrosis stage [22], which allows for the circumvention of prevalence bias, by calculating the rates of correct classification of the blood tests (especially worthwhile in patients with no fibrosis or with cirrhosis); -the individual performance (the most useful for the clinician) by calculating:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall test reproducibility was evaluated through the change in classification rate between the derivation and validation populations [19]. FibroMeter provided the most reproducible diagnostic performance, followed by FibroMeter HICV.…”
Section: Overall Test Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Alongside this project, a number of competing and perhaps equally effective non-invasive diagnostic methodologies have been published. [6][7][8][9][10] This traffic light system is probably no more accurate than the better ones, but it was developed specifically for use in primary care, with the aim of being intuitively easy for patients to understand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%