“…The AUROCs of each test were comparable to those reported in the original publications [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]18,20] when expressed using observed-AUROCs according to the prevalence of stages defining advanced and non-advanced fibrosis. We observed similar AUROCs to those reported in meta-analyses [34][35][36] for the most validated biomarkers, Fibrotest Ò , Fibrometer Ò , and Apri and without major differences with interpretable Fibroscan™, Hepascore Ò , and ELFG. In diagnosing cirrhosis, the ''Fibrostic'' study [37] showed a significantly better performance of Fibroscan™ compared to serum markers while in contrast, our study shows that all the tests performed equivalently.…”