2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Myocardial Work Indices for Identification of Cancer Therapy–Related Cardiotoxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we demonstrated that MWI, MWE and CW (and not WW and GLS) were able to predict moderate CTRCD. This in line with previous observations that showed a lower MWE at baseline in patients who developed CTRCD during follow-up [ 27 ]. As MWE is related to variations in both CW and WW with CW reflecting the Myocardial Work that contributes to cardiac output and WW the work that does not contribute to it, changes in each of these parameters could account for this observation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we demonstrated that MWI, MWE and CW (and not WW and GLS) were able to predict moderate CTRCD. This in line with previous observations that showed a lower MWE at baseline in patients who developed CTRCD during follow-up [ 27 ]. As MWE is related to variations in both CW and WW with CW reflecting the Myocardial Work that contributes to cardiac output and WW the work that does not contribute to it, changes in each of these parameters could account for this observation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast to the work of Calvillo-Argüelles et al, we demonstrated that not a higher WW but rather lower CW was responsible for the depressed MWE at baseline in patients with moderated CTRCD during follow-up. This may suggest there exists a distinct phenotype with a higher susceptibility for developing CTRCD, characterized by an inherent less efficient LV performance due to lower contractile capacity [ 27 ]. Therefore, MW features such as low baseline CW, especially when associated with a rise in WW during follow-up, may identify patients at risk for CTRCD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most notable finding of the study was that GWI and GWE were decreased after the sixth cycle, whereas GLS showed a significant change after the fourth cycle, indicating that GLS is still a sensitive indicator of cardiac dysfunction. Calvillo-Argüelles et al 68 studied 136 HER2+ breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline and trastuzumab therapy, concluding that myocardial work indices did not offer any measurable improvement over GLS and clinical risk factors in predicting CTRCD identified at subsequent visits. They did find that in a small subset of patients with a GLS change (<3.3%) and a systolic blood pressure reduction (>21 mm Hg), myocardial work indices were associated with a higher probability of concurrent CTRCD than GLS.…”
Section: Myocardial Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…63 Cardio-oncology Myocardial work indices associated with a higher probability of concurrent CTRCD than GLS in small subset of patients with >21 mm Hg systolic blood pressure reduction and a GLS change (<3.3%). 68 Valvular heart disease GWI, GCW, and GWW increased in aortic stenosis patients. Reduced GWI and GCW at follow-up are associated with increased mortality.…”
Section: Aortic Regurgitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically global work index and global work efficiency had a more pronounced variation in patients with treatment-induced cardiac dysfunction. 32 , 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%