2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-019-02248-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic performance of the nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence rates of relative and absolute stenoses increase with age, reaching 47.2% and 19.4%, respectively, in the 60-to-69-year-old group [ 1 ]. The typical symptoms of LSS are intermittent claudication, back and leg pains, and limb numbness, which lead to severe disability in daily life and negative impacts on quality of life [ 2 , 3 ]. Intervertebral disk dehydration, annular tears, loss of disk height, and degenerative changes of the facet joint and ligamentum flavum (LF) have been determined to contribute to the progression of LSS [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence rates of relative and absolute stenoses increase with age, reaching 47.2% and 19.4%, respectively, in the 60-to-69-year-old group [ 1 ]. The typical symptoms of LSS are intermittent claudication, back and leg pains, and limb numbness, which lead to severe disability in daily life and negative impacts on quality of life [ 2 , 3 ]. Intervertebral disk dehydration, annular tears, loss of disk height, and degenerative changes of the facet joint and ligamentum flavum (LF) have been determined to contribute to the progression of LSS [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, Barz et al [4] proposed that the NRSS shows high sensitivity and speci city in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Therefore, it can be used as a new imaging index to assist the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis [5][6][7]. Patients with a positive NRSS suffer from poorer clinical outcomes than those with a negative NRSS when they are undergoing conservative therapies [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Barz and colleagues rst reported that sedimentation sign (SedSign) was helpful in the clinical diagnosis of LSS, as a positive SedSign was common in LSS patients [6]. After this original work, a number of studies consistently suggested that SedSign was a powerful tool in the differential diagnosis for LSS [7][8][9]. Such a view, however, was questioned by some researchers that a positive SedSign was merely suggestive of severe LSS [10,11] and the capability of SedSign in differentiating LSS from nonspeci c back pain was limited [12,13,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%