2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic sequencing to support genetically stratified medicine in a tertiary care setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic analysis and outcomes of the MSCH cohort are a subset of the cohort reported by Lippa and colleagues. 30 Briefly, trio or proband-only ES analysis was completed. Candidate genotypes were reviewed with the research team and clinical team to reach a consensus interpretation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic analysis and outcomes of the MSCH cohort are a subset of the cohort reported by Lippa and colleagues. 30 Briefly, trio or proband-only ES analysis was completed. Candidate genotypes were reviewed with the research team and clinical team to reach a consensus interpretation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Columbia University Institutional Review Board approved protocols, and written informed consent was provided for using DNA in genetic research at the IGM at CUIMC. 27 Individuals enrolled at the MSCH were referred by their CUIMC clinician. Written informed consent was provided by the legal guardian for participants younger than 18 years or by the individual when 18 years or older.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic analysis of the MSCH cohort is a subset of that reported by Lippa et al 27 Briefly, trio (ie, ES available from proband and both biological parents) or proband-only ES analyses were completed. Candidate genotypes were reviewed with the research and clinical teams to reach consensus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CLIA-confirmed variants were returned to referring providers and subsequently returned to participants, a process that has been described previously. 27 The current study included participants in this broad epilepsy protocol who were 18 years of age and younger at the time of enrollment and who were deemed to have received a causative variant for their phenotype from the research ES. Participants with only secondary findings unrelated to their epilepsy phenotype were not included.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%