Diagnostic value of transverse axial tomoscintigraphy for the detection of hepatic metastases: Results on 53 examinations and comparison with other diagnostic techniques

Berche, C.; Aubry, Florent; Langlais, Crystal S.; Vitaux, Jean; Parmentier, C.; Paola, R. Di

doi:10.1007/bf00252801

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

The Reference1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1981

1999

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Book2

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, the methods to be used to compare the result with the reference (see section 4.6 below) should ideally depend on the uncertainty associated with the reference and there are some methods to do so (e.g., [12][13][14][15] …”

Section: The Referencementioning

confidence: 99%

<title>The need to develop guidelines for the evaluation of medical image processing procedures</title>

et al. 1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluations of procedures in medical image processing are notoriously difficult and often unconvincing. From a detailed bibliographic study, we analyzed the way evaluation studies are conducted and extracted a number of entities common to any evaluation protocol. From this analysis, we propose here a generic evaluation model (GEM). The GEM includes the notion of hierarchical evaluation, identifies the components which have always to be defined when designing an evaluation protocol and shows the relationships that exist between these components. By suggesting rules applying to the different components of the GEM, we also show how this model can be used as a first step towards guidelines for evaluation.

show abstract

Section: The Referencementioning

confidence: 99%