1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00224527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diallel analysis to predict heterosis and combining ability for grain yield, yield components and bread-making quality in bread wheat (T. aestivum)

Abstract: Combining ability for grain yield, yield components, and several agronomic and qualitative traits, was studied in a seven-parent diallel cross. The 21 F1 hybrids and the seven parental cultivars were grown in replicated plot trials sown at normal seed density in three locations in the years 1992 and 1993. The effects of general combining ability (gca) were highly significant for all the traits measured with the exception of seeds per spikelet, while the specific combining ability (sca) effects were statistical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
2
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
19
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, σ 2 GCA was on average more pronounced compared to σ 2 SCA , which points to higher values of additive versus dominance effects. Our findings are in accordance with previous surveys in wheat (Borghi and Perenzin, 1994; Perenzin et al, 1998), which clearly underlines that selection based on GCA effects is promising and its application in multistage selection programs is relevant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nevertheless, σ 2 GCA was on average more pronounced compared to σ 2 SCA , which points to higher values of additive versus dominance effects. Our findings are in accordance with previous surveys in wheat (Borghi and Perenzin, 1994; Perenzin et al, 1998), which clearly underlines that selection based on GCA effects is promising and its application in multistage selection programs is relevant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The G1 × G4 cross was the best combination among F 1 s for GS. Similar results were reported by Borghi and Perenzin (1994) and Zubair et al (1987). The Mh values for GS indicated that only the G1 × G4 cross showed highly positive significance, and the Hh values also exhibited highly positive significance in 5 crosses for GS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The male line R2 should be discarded from the programme due to its poor sprouting tolerance and if males were subjected to strict selection, it should be possible to breed sprouting tolerant hybrids. Although no reports were found on the sprouting tolerance of hybrids, these results were in line with reports by other authors working on wheat (Bainotti et al, 2009;Borghi and Perenzin, 1994;Humphreys and Noll, 2002;Oury et al, 1995;Pickett and Galwey, 1997).…”
Section: Physiological Maturity Plus 21 Dayssupporting
confidence: 93%