2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1181-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diaphragmatic breathing during virtual reality exposure therapy for aviophobia: functional coping strategy or avoidance behavior? a pilot study

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough there is solid evidence for the efficacy of in vivo and virtual reality (VR) exposure therapy for a specific phobia, there is a significant debate over whether techniques promoting distraction or relaxation have impairing or enhancing effects on treatment outcome. In the present pilot study, we investigated the effect of diaphragmatic breathing (DB) as a relaxation technique during VR exposure treatment.MethodTwenty-nine patients with aviophobia were randomly assigned to VR exposure treatmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
3
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
31
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychological treatments using virtual reality (VR) have shown promising results for different psychopathologies (Riva et al, 2016; Freeman et al, 2017), including specific phobia (Shiban et al, 2017; Meyerbröker et al, 2018), social phobia (Bouchard et al, 2017), PTSD (Rothbaum et al, 2014; Beidel et al, 2017), eating disorders (Manzoni et al, 2016; Ferrer-García et al, 2017), and schizophrenia (du Sert et al, 2018; Pot-Kolder et al, 2018), among others. To date, the most evidence for the efficacy of VR treatments has been shown in phobic disorders (Parsons and Rizzo, 2008; Powers and Emmelkamp, 2008; Opris et al, 2012; Turner and Casey, 2014; Morina et al, 2015), where pioneering studies established VR as a treatment medium as early as the late 1990s (e.g., for claustrophobia treatment, Botella et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological treatments using virtual reality (VR) have shown promising results for different psychopathologies (Riva et al, 2016; Freeman et al, 2017), including specific phobia (Shiban et al, 2017; Meyerbröker et al, 2018), social phobia (Bouchard et al, 2017), PTSD (Rothbaum et al, 2014; Beidel et al, 2017), eating disorders (Manzoni et al, 2016; Ferrer-García et al, 2017), and schizophrenia (du Sert et al, 2018; Pot-Kolder et al, 2018), among others. To date, the most evidence for the efficacy of VR treatments has been shown in phobic disorders (Parsons and Rizzo, 2008; Powers and Emmelkamp, 2008; Opris et al, 2012; Turner and Casey, 2014; Morina et al, 2015), where pioneering studies established VR as a treatment medium as early as the late 1990s (e.g., for claustrophobia treatment, Botella et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological measures can also be used to evaluate the progress of the therapy. Shiban et al (2017) created a virtual exposure application for the treatment of aviophobia. Heart rate and skin conductance were measured as indicators for the fear elicited by a virtual airplane flight.…”
Section: Exposure Therapiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies the independent variable is the number of expositions or sessions and the dependent variable is the physiological measure. This is often done to quantify the progress of a therapy or training (Lee et al, 2015;Shiban et al, 2017) but can, for example, also be used to determine a habituation to cybersickness inducing stimuli (Gavgani et al, 2017). • Correlation: Physiological measures can be used to establish a relationship between the measure and a second variable.…”
Section: High-level Purposesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, music may be useful only in certain phases of therapy. Shiban et al 44 used diaphragmatic breathing to augment VRE for flying phobia. At both 1 week and 1 year after intervention, a significant reduction of fear was confirmed by a self-report measure in both intervention and control groups, and there was no significant difference between groups.…”
Section: Others (N = 9)mentioning
confidence: 99%