Die Internationalisierung der Politik und der Machtverlust der Parlamente

Lübbe-Wolff, Gertrude

doi:10.5771/9783845215921-125

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the same time the fragmented legal and administrational means of states, inter-, trans-and supranational organizations seems not to be sufficient to get the unleashed destructive potential of religious fundamentalism under control: There will be Blood. • Last but not least the (internally fragmented) executive branches of state-power have decoupled themselves from the state-based separation, coordination and unification of powers under the democratic rule of law, and they too have gone global (Tietje, 2003(Tietje, , p. 1081(Tietje, -1164Möllers, 2005, p. 351-389;Kingsbury, 2006;Möllers;Voßkuhle;Walter, 2007;Fischer-Lescano, 2008, p. 373-383;Lübbe-Wolf, 2009;Dobner, 2006). 12 As a result of this, the new globalized executive power seems to be undergoing the same transformation as markets and religious belief systems, and it is thus transformed, third, from state-embedded power to power-embedded states.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Democracy under pressure: the return of the Dialectic of Enlightenment in the world society

Brunkhorst¹

2010

Civitas, Rev. Ciênc. Soc. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2007); Fischer-Lescano (2008, p. 373-383). On the globalization of executive power: ; Dobner (2006); Lübbe- Wolf (2009). structure of the world society.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Democracy under pressure: the return of the Dialectic of Enlightenment in the world society

Brunkhorst¹

2010

Civitas, Rev. Ciênc. Soc. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Philosophical Dimensions of Human Rights

Corradetti¹

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dialectical snares: human rights and democracy in the world society

Brunkhorst

2009

Ethics & Global Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper starts with a thesis on the dialectical structure of modern law that goes back to the European revolutionary tradition and constitutes a legal structure that is at once emancipatory and repressive. Once it became democratic, the modern nation state has solved more or less successfully the crises that have emerged in modern Europe since the 16th Century. Yet, this state did not escape the dialectical snares of modern law and modern legal regimes. It's greatest advance, the exclusion of inequalities, presupposed the exclusion of the internal other of blacks, workers, women, etc., and the other that stemmed from the non-European world that furthermore was under European colonial rule or other forms of European, North American, or Japanese imperial control. Yet, the wars and revolutions of the 20th Century led to a complete reconstruction, new foundation, and globalization of all national and international law. The evolutionary advance of the 20th Century was the emergence of world law, and this enabled the construction of international and national welfarism and the global expansion of the exclusion of inequalities. Nevertheless, the dialectic of enlightenment returned and led to new forms of post-national domination, hegemony, oppression, and exclusion. The final section of the paper tries to detect some ideas and principles for how to overcome the crisis.

show abstract

Die Internationalisierung der Politik und der Machtverlust der Parlamente

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Democracy under pressure: the return of the Dialectic of Enlightenment in the world society

Democracy under pressure: the return of the Dialectic of Enlightenment in the world society

Philosophical Dimensions of Human Rights

Dialectical snares: human rights and democracy in the world society

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About