1970 Help me understand this report
Die postoperative arthrographische Beurteilung von Meniskusresten und Meniskusregeneraten
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
1
Citation Types
0
2
0
Year Published
1976
1976
Publication Types
Select...
1
Relationship
0
1
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
2
0
“…In postoperative arthrography it is difficult to differentiate between a remnant and a regenerate. The length of the remnant (more than 10 mm), the infiltration by contrast medium, and a rupture in the remnant are all indicative of a remnant with clinical significance (Fischedick 1963, Thiemann & Fischer 1970.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In postoperative arthrography it is difficult to differentiate between a remnant and a regenerate. The length of the remnant (more than 10 mm), the infiltration by contrast medium, and a rupture in the remnant are all indicative of a remnant with clinical significance (Fischedick 1963, Thiemann & Fischer 1970.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arthrography can provide valuable support in the solving of the problem, but even the findings in a postoperative arthrogram are not conclusive evidence (Fischedick 1963, Thiemann & Fischer 1970, Debnam & Staple 1974.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
