2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA2011 guidelines and EN-1992-1-1:2004 standard with respect to the design of the minimum reinforcement and crack width from imposed deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, the concrete age, t, is not specified. These inaccuracies have been discussed in [42,43], and using the German standard DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA [44] is recommended. In this standard, f ct,eff is equal to 0.5f ctm .…”
Section: Reinforcement Area and Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the concrete age, t, is not specified. These inaccuracies have been discussed in [42,43], and using the German standard DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA [44] is recommended. In this standard, f ct,eff is equal to 0.5f ctm .…”
Section: Reinforcement Area and Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%