2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-022-01562-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in acoustic detectibility of bat species hamper Environmental Impact Assessment studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a particular bat species has echolocation calls that are more easily detected by microphones, it could lead to an overestimation of its abundance compared to species with less detectable calls [ 59 ]. Thus, variations in activity values could arise from differences in the probability of detection rather than from actual variations in activity levels [ 60 , 61 ]. Unfortunately, we lack specific data on the intensity of calls for the bat species in our study sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a particular bat species has echolocation calls that are more easily detected by microphones, it could lead to an overestimation of its abundance compared to species with less detectable calls [ 59 ]. Thus, variations in activity values could arise from differences in the probability of detection rather than from actual variations in activity levels [ 60 , 61 ]. Unfortunately, we lack specific data on the intensity of calls for the bat species in our study sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%