2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in first-mile and last-mile behaviour in candidate multi-modal Boston bike-share micromobility trips

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described in the introduction, the trip for metro access and egress (refers to taxi-metro integrated use) bridges the frst-and-last-mile gaps. Te feeder mode choice for metro access and egress is also afected by the characteristics of travel [5,22]. Walking, bicycling, and bus are the most common feeding mode for metro access and egress [8,23,24].…”
Section: Te Feeder Mode Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in the introduction, the trip for metro access and egress (refers to taxi-metro integrated use) bridges the frst-and-last-mile gaps. Te feeder mode choice for metro access and egress is also afected by the characteristics of travel [5,22]. Walking, bicycling, and bus are the most common feeding mode for metro access and egress [8,23,24].…”
Section: Te Feeder Mode Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared micro-mobility services have been proliferating worldwide in the past few years, including dockless escooters, dockless and docked bikes and e-bikes, etc. Due to their environmentally-friendly and flexible characteristics, shared micro-mobility services have been widely used to supplement public transport by dealing with first and last-mile problems (Qin et al, 2018;Romm et al, 2022). However, there are also many problems that are brought by them, such as disorderly placement of vehicles, and overproduction of facilities leading to resource wasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%