2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oftale.2020.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in intermediate vision: Monofocal intraocular lenses vs. monofocal extended depth of focus intraocular lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
39
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
10
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the ZCB00 group, both UIVA ( p < 0.001) and UNVA ( p = 0.038) were significantly superior in the ICB00 group. In this study, the postoperative monocular UDVA and CDVA results were similar between the ICB00 and ZCB00, consistent with previous reports [3,8,22]. Contrary to previous studies, the present study observed significant differences in near visual acuity between the two IOLs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the ZCB00 group, both UIVA ( p < 0.001) and UNVA ( p = 0.038) were significantly superior in the ICB00 group. In this study, the postoperative monocular UDVA and CDVA results were similar between the ICB00 and ZCB00, consistent with previous reports [3,8,22]. Contrary to previous studies, the present study observed significant differences in near visual acuity between the two IOLs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies have reported a monocular UIVA of 0.24, 0.26, and 0.28 for the ICB00 and 0.39, 0.40, the 0.45 for the ZCB00 and a monocular UNVA of 0.46, and 0.50 and 0.50, and 0.81, respectively [3,8,22]. In this study, the UIVA values were 0.24 ± 0.10 and 0.34 ± 0.12 and the UNVA values were 0.46 ± 0.14 and 0.51 ± 0.19 for the ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations