2013
DOI: 10.3354/meps10269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different calcification rates in males and females of the coral Porites panamensis in the Gulf of California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
1
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
32
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between genders were documented both herein and previously founded (Cabral-Tena et al, 2013;CarricartGanivet et al, 2013). Males in columnar and corallith morphotypes present higher growth rates than female colonies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences between genders were documented both herein and previously founded (Cabral-Tena et al, 2013;CarricartGanivet et al, 2013). Males in columnar and corallith morphotypes present higher growth rates than female colonies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The sex of coral can also affect its growth and timing of densityband formation, due males and females invest in different proportions the energy available for physiological processes such as reproduction and calcification (Harrison, 2011;CarricartGanivet et al, 2013). In consequence, genders may present different annual growth parameters between them (Cabral-Tena et al, 2013). Therefore, the coral's genders may affect the interpretation of the environmental proxies bound within the skeleton (Carricart-Ganivet et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fossil coral specimens from the same site displaying reciprocal calcification rhythms relative to the oxygen isotope cycles may, therefore, reflect gender differences as well. Sex proportions of female : male colonies in the modern P. panamensis are 2 : 1 (Cabral- Tena et al, 2013), however, our set of data is too small for a statistical evaluation, and gender differences are not documented in the skeleton. Nonetheless, the observed variations in calcification are likely not gender specific, because in some specimens no relationship exists between the δ 18 O cycle and the rhythm of growth banding, whereas it changes in others from the summer mode of HDB formation to the winter mode or vice versa upon continual growth.…”
Section: Relationships Between Stable Isotope Signatures and Calcificmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For these three inferences we suggest the oxygen isotope cycle to represent the more reliable internal chronology than the patterns of density banding, and the rhythm of density banding to have been variable from coral to coral and to some degree within corals. Disparities in skeletal growth rhythms have been reported recently from female and male colonies within one taxon (Porites panamensis), with female colonies growing slower and calcification rates being lower than in males (Cabral-Tena et al, 2013). Fossil coral specimens from the same site displaying reciprocal calcification rhythms relative to the oxygen isotope cycles may, therefore, reflect gender differences as well.…”
Section: Relationships Between Stable Isotope Signatures and Calcificmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation