2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different inhaled allergen challenge models give reproducible results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have also demonstrated the reproducibility of the BAC in mild allergic asthmatics. 87 Importantly, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the allergen dose eliciting the EAR, the LAR, and a significant increase in sputum eosinophilia are .80, .77, and .60, respectively (all values within the good-to-excellent range). [88][89][90] On the other hand, no published study has investigated the reproducibility of the CAC, although a 92% concordance for HDM has been reported in a congress communication.…”
Section: Reproducib Ilit Ymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have also demonstrated the reproducibility of the BAC in mild allergic asthmatics. 87 Importantly, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the allergen dose eliciting the EAR, the LAR, and a significant increase in sputum eosinophilia are .80, .77, and .60, respectively (all values within the good-to-excellent range). [88][89][90] On the other hand, no published study has investigated the reproducibility of the CAC, although a 92% concordance for HDM has been reported in a congress communication.…”
Section: Reproducib Ilit Ymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Of note, no false positive result was observed. Many studies have also demonstrated the reproducibility of the BAC in mild allergic asthmatics 87 . Importantly, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the allergen dose eliciting the EAR, the LAR, and a significant increase in sputum eosinophilia are .80, .77, and .60, respectively (all values within the good‐to‐excellent range) 88–90 .…”
Section: Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Baseline induced sputum and bronchoscopy samples were collected. Induced sputum samples were processed to obtain supernatant for protein analysis and differential cell count cytospins [ 20 ]. Bronchoscopy was performed to collect bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid for protein analysis and bronchial biopsies for immunohistochemical analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of IL-5 and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were assessed in sputum supernatants and bronchoalveolar lavage by MesoScaleDiscovery assay at SGS Cephac Europe, Saint Benoît Cedex, France. Sputum differential cell counts were assessed by Rapi-Diff stain [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,56,86 When controlling for all these factors, BAC has a good reproducibility in mild asthmatics. 87 The dose eliciting EAR in a patient subjected to consecutive bronchial challenges with the same allergen remains within a twofold variation, 85 with an excellent (0.80) intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) demonstrated for the percentage fall in FEV 1 during the 3 h following allergen inhalation. 84 Moreover, a good-to-excellent (0.60-0.77) ICC has been described for LAR, whereas a good (0.60) ICC was reported for sputum eosinophilia 7 h after allergen inhalation.…”
Section: Reproducib Ilit Ymentioning
confidence: 99%