Different methods of observation affect EEG measures associated with auditory hallucinations

Serafetinides, E. A.; Coger, Roger W.; Martin, J.

doi:10.1016/0165-1781(86)90043-0

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Symptom Capture Studies1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1987

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Book2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A few years later, Serafetinides et al (1986) investigated the influence of verbal versus button-press methods to indicate auditory hallucinations on oscillations in the EEG. The method used to determine the presence of hallucinations had a marked effect on EEG results.…”

Section: Symptom Capture Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Neurophysiology of Auditory Hallucinations – A Historical and Contemporary Review

Lutterveld¹,

Sommer²,

Ford³

2011

Front. Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography are two techniques that distinguish themselves from other neuroimaging methodologies through their ability to directly measure brain-related activity and their high temporal resolution. A large body of research has applied these techniques to study auditory hallucinations. Across a variety of approaches, the left superior temporal cortex is consistently reported to be involved in this symptom. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that a failure in corollary discharge, i.e., a neural signal originating in frontal speech areas that indicates to sensory areas that forthcoming thought is self-generated, may underlie the experience of auditory hallucinations.

show abstract

Section: Symptom Capture Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%