2004
DOI: 10.1163/1568562041959991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential degradation rates in vivo and in vitro of biocompatible poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolic acid) homo- and co-polymers for a polymeric drug-delivery microchip

Abstract: The biocompatibility and biodegradation rate of component materials are critical when designing a drug-delivery device. The degradation products and rate of degradation may play important roles in determining the local cellular response to the implanted material. In this study, we investigated the biocompatibility and relative biodegradation rates of PLA, PGA and two poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) polymers of 50:50 mol ratio, thin-film component materials of a drug-delivery microchip developed in our lab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These particular traits render these systems very interesting for drug delivery applications. Furthermore, tuning of the biodegradability can be performed by blending PLA and PGA in a co-polymer (PLGA), and by changing the proportion of each of these materials in the copolymer (Miller et al, 1977;Pillai and Panchagnula, 2001;Grayson et al, 2004), as PLA degrades much slower than PGA. Degradation of PLA and PLGA is known to proceed by hydrolytic scission of the polymer chain and depolymerization is influenced by molecular weight (MW), polydispersity and crystallinity (Weinhold et al, 1998;Li and Wozney, 2001).…”
Section: Incorporation and Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These particular traits render these systems very interesting for drug delivery applications. Furthermore, tuning of the biodegradability can be performed by blending PLA and PGA in a co-polymer (PLGA), and by changing the proportion of each of these materials in the copolymer (Miller et al, 1977;Pillai and Panchagnula, 2001;Grayson et al, 2004), as PLA degrades much slower than PGA. Degradation of PLA and PLGA is known to proceed by hydrolytic scission of the polymer chain and depolymerization is influenced by molecular weight (MW), polydispersity and crystallinity (Weinhold et al, 1998;Li and Wozney, 2001).…”
Section: Incorporation and Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). 45,46 The active format (Fig. 3) is constructed from a silicon wafer containing multiple microscale reservoirs that can be opened to release drugs through electrochemical dissolution of a thin gold membrane (anode) which covers the micro-reservoirs.…”
Section: Miniaturized Drug Delivery Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mild inflammatory reactions have been observed after a massive release of acidic degradation in vivo depending on the amount and degradation rate of the material (Bostman et al, 1990;Grayson et al, 2004;Holy et al, 1999;Hutmacher, 2000;Thomson et al, 1999;Young et al, 2002). However, the use of synthetic biocompatible material has the enormous advantage of reproducible synthesis and the mechanical and chemical properties including the structure, size, viscosity, and porosity, as well as degradation rate of the desired scaffold can be controlled.…”
Section: Polylactide Acid and Polyglycolide Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%