Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2739482.2768471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Evolution with a Repair Method to Solve Dynamic Constrained Optimization Problems

Abstract: An algorithm inspired in two differential evolution variants is proposed to solve Dynamic Constrained Optimization Problems (DCOPs). It is also added a repair method based on the differential mutation, which does not require feasible solutions as reference. This approach is compared against state-of-the-art algorithms to solve DCOPs. Different performance measures are employed in the tests to show the competitiveness of our proposal at different change frequencies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method does not help to transfer an effective learning experience from one environment to the next. There are several approaches for tracking the changing optimum, that include introducing diversity [4][5][6], diversity-maintaining [7,8], memory-based [9], prediction-based [10,11] and multi-population approaches [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this method does not help to transfer an effective learning experience from one environment to the next. There are several approaches for tracking the changing optimum, that include introducing diversity [4][5][6], diversity-maintaining [7,8], memory-based [9], prediction-based [10,11] and multi-population approaches [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the best solution is recorded before proceeding to the next phase which deals with the environmental changes and updates the population for the new environment. Although the proposed framework can adapt to any optimizer, in this paper, we selected MODE due to its good performance in solving optimization problems [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Proposed Approach 321 Dynamic Constrained Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ameca-Alducin et al [11], [12], improved the DDECV algorithm by applying a mutant repair method (DDECV + Repair) to it as a CHT to produce better results without the need for a reference solution. However, this is computationally expensive when the feasible region is small.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with this, common approaches include mechanisms for repairing and/or tracking the feasible region. However, some are computationally expensive [11], [12] and/or developed for only specific types of changes [13] or loss of diversity [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%