2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difficulty demonstrating estradiol-mediated Erk1/2 phosphorylation in MCF-7 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the interference of serum factors on the cell-killing effect of doxorubicin and to minimize the stress-response induced by complete removal of the serum factors [ 25 ], cell growth of MCF-7 cells in the presence of different concentrations of fetal bovine serum (FBS) was monitored using the MTT and trypan blue exclusion assays (data not shown). When the FBS concentration was reduced from 10% to 2%, there was no obvious change of cell growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the interference of serum factors on the cell-killing effect of doxorubicin and to minimize the stress-response induced by complete removal of the serum factors [ 25 ], cell growth of MCF-7 cells in the presence of different concentrations of fetal bovine serum (FBS) was monitored using the MTT and trypan blue exclusion assays (data not shown). When the FBS concentration was reduced from 10% to 2%, there was no obvious change of cell growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar observations were also reported by a number of other investigators (Bonapace et al, 1996; Joel et al, 1998; Lobenhofer and Marks, 2000; Lobenhofer et al, 2000; Caristi et al, 2001). Brower and colleagues attempted to address this problem by using a cell line from a laboratory which had reported positive responses (Filardo et al, 2000), but their result still turned out negative (Brower et al, 2005). Thus, it appears that the membrane ERα is non-functional in the MCF-7 cells used in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the GPR30 agonists used, 17β-E 2 , ICI 182,780 or G-1, was able to induce Akt or ERK1/2 phosphorylation, at any of the time points tested (Figure 4). The lack of response to GPR30 agonists has been reported in other cell types (Brower, Roberts, Antonini, & Miller, 2005;Otto et al, 2008), including human breast cancer cell lines and BAEC. Unlike in cells where GPR30 was reported to be activated by 17β-E 2 , ICI 182,780 or G-1, in MCF-7 cells and BAEC, the GPR30 species of 44 and 50-55 kDa were undetectable, suggesting that those species are required for effective GPR30 signaling (Sousa et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%