2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(02)01435-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction of real and virtual photons in a pyrolytic graphite crystal as source of intensive quasimonochromatic X-ray beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The divergence of the electron beam incident on the target, multiple scattering of the electrons in the crystal, collimation of radiation and other experimental factors were taken into account according to the procedure described in [18].…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The divergence of the electron beam incident on the target, multiple scattering of the electrons in the crystal, collimation of radiation and other experimental factors were taken into account according to the procedure described in [18].…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate spectral-angular distribution of bremsstrahlung with account multiple scattering in accordance with the methodology [18], the target is divided into a large number of layers with thickness Dt.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shortcomings require the development of new methods for measuring the transverse dimensions of a particle beam based on measuring the total angular distribution of the PXR and taking into account its features, in particular, the azimuthal asymmetry and the contributions of other coherent radiation mechanisms such as diffracted transition radiation (DTR) and diffracted bremsstrahlung (DB); see, e.g., Refs. [6,9,10], and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the exper iment [12], for the observation angle of 90° and E0 = 900 MeV, the error increased because of the uncertainty of the average number of passages of electrons in the ring accelerator through a thin target and the strong dependence of this value on the crystal orientation [21] and was about 25-30%. The accelerator parameters, the experimental scheme, and the technique of per forming the measurements are described are described in detail in [16,17,22].…”
Section: Experimental Device and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%