1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1990.tb06753.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusible IAA and dominance phenomena in fruits of apple and tomato

Abstract: 1990. Diffusible IAA and dominance phenomena in fruits of apple and tomato -Physiol. Plant 79: 354-358.The relationships between indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) diffusing out of the fruit and competition among fruits, and between fruits and shoot tips were investigated using apple (Mains domestica Borkh. cv. Jonagold) and tomato {Lycopersicon esculentum Miii.) piants. Dominant fruits always had more diffusible IAA than subordinated, inhibited fi'uits. Alterations in dominance -by fruit-or shoot tip removal -led to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been achieved as far as 3 H-IAA transport is concerned by Morris (1977). In experiments where other dominance phenomena were studied, like wheat grains (Aufhammer et al 1986), fruit of cucumber (Shehata 1990) and tomato and apple (Gruber and Bangerth 1990), transport of endogenous IAA was always higher out of dominant organs. These facts may be explained by assuming, beside an autostimulating effect of IAA on its own basipolar transport system (Goldsmith 1977), in the dominant branch, an 'autoinhibition effect at junctions', where the two IAA streams meet each other and extend in the dominated branch (Bangerth 1989; see also Warren-Wilson et al 1991 for similar effects).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similar results have been achieved as far as 3 H-IAA transport is concerned by Morris (1977). In experiments where other dominance phenomena were studied, like wheat grains (Aufhammer et al 1986), fruit of cucumber (Shehata 1990) and tomato and apple (Gruber and Bangerth 1990), transport of endogenous IAA was always higher out of dominant organs. These facts may be explained by assuming, beside an autostimulating effect of IAA on its own basipolar transport system (Goldsmith 1977), in the dominant branch, an 'autoinhibition effect at junctions', where the two IAA streams meet each other and extend in the dominated branch (Bangerth 1989; see also Warren-Wilson et al 1991 for similar effects).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For instance, in both phenomena, inhibitory effects can be abolished by physical removal of the dominant structures (e.g. shoot tips or early developing fruits), while application of the hormone auxin to the cut site reverses the loss of inhibition (McCallum, ,b; Snow, ; Thimann and Skoog, ; Quinlan and Preston, ; Bangerth, ; Gruber and Bangerth, ; Thomas et al ., ). The growth of an organ is also tightly correlated with its ability to export auxin (Bangerth, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ursache hierfur soU eine Angleichung der IAA-Exportraten aus generativen Organen sein. Untersuchungen von GRUBER und BANGERTH (1990) zeigten, daf^ die sich zuerst entwickelnden dominanten Friichte deutlich hohere IAA-Exportraten aufweisen als unterdriickte Friichte.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified