2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of testicular germ cell neoplasms: Effect of ROI methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values and interobserver variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this needs to be validated in a larger patient cohort as ADC and SWE could serve as a non-invasive tool for histological differentiation. Non-seminoma tumors had less diffusion restriction with a higher ADC mean compared to seminoma tumors (Table 2), confirming previous results (25). SWE showed an increased stiffness in non-seminomas compared to seminomas, which has not been reported previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this needs to be validated in a larger patient cohort as ADC and SWE could serve as a non-invasive tool for histological differentiation. Non-seminoma tumors had less diffusion restriction with a higher ADC mean compared to seminoma tumors (Table 2), confirming previous results (25). SWE showed an increased stiffness in non-seminomas compared to seminomas, which has not been reported previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Non-seminoma tumors had less diffusion restriction with a higher ADC mean compared to seminoma tumors (Table 2), confirming previous results (25). SWE showed an increased stiffness in non-seminomas compared to seminomas, which has not been reported previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the number of patients was limited to 21 cases and the interpretation of MRI findings will always be dependent on radiologist expertise. Other studies have focused on quantitative MRI imaging, such as DWI with ADC values giving promising results in discriminating SGCT-NSGCT status with an AUC of 0.906 9,10,28,29 . The robustness of these results was also proven against different ROI definitions 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have focused on quantitative MRI imaging, such as DWI with ADC values giving promising results in discriminating SGCT-NSGCT status with an AUC of 0.906 9,10,28,29 . The robustness of these results was also proven against different ROI definitions 28 . Furthermore, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI has been also proven to be a valuable semi-quantitative method to discriminate TGCT and TNGCT lesions with a maximum AUC of 0.89; however, these methods do not provide numerical data for a standardized assessment 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the small-sample method, a round/oval ROI is placed on the solid portion of the tumor. The effects of ROI methods on ADC measurements have been investigated in some tumors, and each ROI method has its own advantages and disadvantages (27)(28)(29). Wholevolume ROI can reduce inter-or intra-observer variability in ADC measurements; however, it is time-consuming and its application is limited in clinical practice (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%