Comparative Archaeologies 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8225-4_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dig Up–Dig in: Practice and Theory in Hungarian Archaeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such changes have recently altered the face of heritage protection in the country by practically ruling 120 Banner et al (1954). 121 Bartosiewicz et al (2011) 325. 122 Bartosiewicz et al (2011) 326.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such changes have recently altered the face of heritage protection in the country by practically ruling 120 Banner et al (1954). 121 Bartosiewicz et al (2011) 325. 122 Bartosiewicz et al (2011) 326.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only five years later, in 1782 at Pécs ( fig. 1:2), a Late Roman sepulchral chamber was 3 Laszlovszky and Siklódi (1991) 291; Bartosiewicz et al (2011) 326. 4 Bartosiewicz et al (2011).…”
Section: Priorities and Key Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reviewing the archaeology of Hungary in general, and of Neolithic studies in particular, during the communist/ socialist period after the Second World War have recently been published. These studies also addressed issues regarding the extent to which research agendas and research methods were determined and influenced by the political situation and the ideology of the period (Laszlovszky and Siklódi 1991; Chapman 1997; Bartosiewicz et al 2011;Bánffy 2013a;Chapman and Palincaş 2013;Bartosiewicz 2017), although archaeology was probably the least politically committed discipline among the humanities (Bartosiewicz et al 2011, 287). The ideology of Marxism or, more accurately, its misinterpreted, vulgar-Marxist version, was not conducive to any discussion of theoretical issues because these were deemed politically subversive.…”
Section: General Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its chronological position and the completeness of the skeleton highlights the uniqueness of the Tulln record. It is the first complete camel skeleton found in Central Europe and Central European territories under the control of the Ottoman Empire [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], apart from the complete skeleton of a dromedary recovered from the sediments of the Theodosius harbor on the European part of Istanbul [ 13 ]. In this study we combine archaeological as well as complementary morphologic and molecular genetic analyses to unravel the mystery of the sunken ship of the desert at the river Danube in Tulln.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%