1986
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.158.1.3940394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.

Abstract: A modified receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was performed in which five readers were asked to locate multiple nodules on images of an anthropomorphic phantom obtained with a prototype digital radiographic chest unit and with a conventional chest unit. Results indicate that when nodules were projected over the lungs, a significantly greater number (significant at the 5% level) were identified on conventional radiographs, whereas for nodules projected over the mediastinum, the digital images were no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
2
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the diagnostic performance of UTE and MR angiography in the detection of PE, alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (AFROC) analysis was performed (26)(27)(28)(29)(30). AFROC is a modified receiver operating characteristic curve technique that allows multiple responses and incorporates the location of lesions (28,30).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the diagnostic performance of UTE and MR angiography in the detection of PE, alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (AFROC) analysis was performed (26)(27)(28)(29)(30). AFROC is a modified receiver operating characteristic curve technique that allows multiple responses and incorporates the location of lesions (28,30).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generalization of LROC in which the location of multiple signals is determined is free-response operating characteristic analysis, FROC (Bunch et al, 1978). Extensions of FROC analysis are alternative free-response operating characteristic, AFROC, and free-response forced error, FFE, analyses (Chakraborty et al, 1986;Chakraborty, 1989;Chakraborty and Winter, 1990). These tests could be applied to evaluating an observer's (or a metho d s ) ability to correctly identify multiple lesions (such as enamel hypoplasias, porotic hyperostoses, and radiopaque transverse lines).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection rate was evaluated by free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis. [19][20][21][22] The number of false positives per image and the true-positive rate were evaluated using the island number at the time point of binarization processing of ANN output images by various threshold values.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Our Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%