Digital Health Interventions for Adult Patients With Cancer Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Digital care has become an essential component of health care. Interventions for patients with cancer need to be effective and safe, and digital health interventions must adhere to the same requirements. Objective The purpose of this study was to identify currently available digital health interventions developed and evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) targeting adult patients with cancer. Methods A scoping review using the JBI methodology was conducted. The participants were adult patients with cancer, and the concept was digital health interventions. The context was open, and sources were limited to RCT effectiveness studies. The PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Research Information Sharing Service, and KoreaMed databases were searched. Data were extracted and analyzed to achieve summarized results about the participants, types, functions, and outcomes of digital health interventions. Results A total of 231 studies were reviewed. Digital health interventions were used mostly at home (187/231, 81%), and the web-based intervention was the most frequently used intervention modality (116/231, 50.2%). Interventions consisting of multiple functional components were most frequently identified (69/231, 29.9%), followed by those with the self-manage function (67/231, 29%). Web-based interventions targeting symptoms with the self-manage and multiple functions and web-based interventions to treat cognitive function and fear of cancer recurrence consistently achieved positive outcomes. More studies supported the positive effects of web-based interventions to inform decision-making and knowledge. The effectiveness of digital health interventions targeting anxiety, depression, distress, fatigue, health-related quality of life or quality of life, pain, physical activity, and sleep was subject to their type and function. A relatively small number of digital health interventions specifically targeted older adults (6/231, 2.6%) or patients with advanced or metastatic cancer (22/231, 9.5%). Conclusions This scoping review summarized digital health interventions developed and evaluated in RCTs involving adult patients with cancer. Systematic reviews of the identified digital interventions are strongly recommended to integrate digital health interventions into clinical practice. The identified gaps in digital health interventions for cancer care need to be reflected in future digital health research.

A Scoping Review and a Taxonomy to Assess the Impact of Mobile Apps on Cancer Care Management

“…These results align with another review that emphasized the beneficial effects of digital interventions on anxiety and symptom management. However, the latter review encompassed a wider range of interventions, such as web-based platforms, mobile apps, tele monitoring, and telemedicine in cancer care, whereas our review focused only on mobile-based interventions for cancer care [ 84 ].…”

What Do We Know about Medication Adherence Interventions in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Multiple Sclerosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

“…105 Systems have become more user-friendly, typically, with rising numbers of people accessing the internet. 106 Intervention usability and acceptability is increasingly critical, with an intervention needing to be accessible and easy to use for all, including clinical staff and researchers. 48 If participants recognise the importance of an intervention and the impact this has on their understanding and condition, it is more likely to have a positive effect on their adherence, and attrition rates.…”

Efficacy of a digital lifestyle intervention on health-related QUAlity of life in non-small cell LUng CAncer survivors following inpatient rehabilitation: protocol of the QUALUCA Swiss multicentre randomised controlled trial

“…Digital health interventions (DHIs), such as digital lifestyle interventions, may be useful aftercare programmes, as they may ease cancer survivors’ transition from a clinical setting (eg, rehabilitation) to home 29. DHIs for cancer survivors can provide location-independent and time-independent, cost-effective, safe and scalable assistance 30–32.…”